WallStSmart

Canadian Natural Resources Ltd (CNQ)vsTrane Technologies plc (TT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Canadian Natural Resources Ltd generates 79% more annual revenue ($38.63B vs $21.60B). CNQ leads profitability with a 25.1% profit margin vs 13.4%. TT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.01. CNQ earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 58/100 (C).

CNQ

Buy

58

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 2.0Profit: 8.5Value: 7.3Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 2.05

TT

Buy

52

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 8.0Value: 4.3Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 7/9Altman Z: 2.77
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CNQUndervalued (+50.8%)

Margin of Safety

+50.8%

Fair Value

$83.51

Current Price

$45.70

$37.81 discount

UndervaluedFair: $83.51Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for TT.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CNQ6 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
11.8x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Return on EquityProfitability
30.3%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 30 in profit

Market CapQuality
$91.79B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Profit MarginProfitability
25.1%9/10

Keeps 25 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Price/BookValuation
3.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
21.8%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 21.8%

TT2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
33.6%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 34 in profit

Market CapQuality
$104.46B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Areas to Watch

CNQ3 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
3.422/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-1.2%2/10

Revenue declined 1.2%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-45.3%2/10

Earnings declined 45.3%

TT4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.014/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
36.1x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
11.9x4/10

Trading at 11.9x book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
-2.1%2/10

Earnings declined 2.1%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CNQ

The strongest argument for CNQ centers on P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Market Cap. Profitability is solid with margins at 25.1% and operating margin at 21.8%.

Bull Case : TT

The strongest argument for TT centers on Return on Equity, Market Cap.

Bear Case : CNQ

The primary concerns for CNQ are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : TT

The primary concerns for TT are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CNQ profiles as a declining stock while TT is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

TT carries more volatility with a beta of 1.21 — expect wider price swings.

TT is growing revenue faster at 6.0% — sustainability is the question.

CNQ generates stronger free cash flow (856M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CNQ scores higher overall (58/100 vs 52/100), backed by strong 25.1% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Canadian Natural Resources Ltd

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Canadian Natural Resources Limited acquires, explores, develops, produces, markets and sells crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids (NGL). The company is headquartered in Calgary, Canada.

Trane Technologies plc

INDUSTRIALS · BUILDING PRODUCTS & EQUIPMENT · USA

Trane Technologies plc is an American Irish domiciled diversified industrial manufacturing company. It is headquartered near Dublin, Ireland.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?