WallStSmart

California Water Service Group (CWT)vsGlobal Water Resources Inc (GWRS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

California Water Service Group generates 1694% more annual revenue ($1.00B vs $55.76M). CWT leads profitability with a 12.8% profit margin vs 5.3%. CWT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.00. CWT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 47/100 (D+).

CWT

Hold

47

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 3.3Profit: 5.0Value: 7.3Quality: 2.8
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 0.74

GWRS

Avoid

34

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.0Profit: 4.0Value: 2.0Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CWTSignificantly Overvalued (-202.0%)

Margin of Safety

-202.0%

Fair Value

$14.62

Current Price

$43.94

$29.32 premium

UndervaluedFair: $14.62Overvalued
GWRSSignificantly Overvalued (-1114.7%)

Margin of Safety

-1114.7%

Fair Value

$0.75

Current Price

$7.37

$6.62 premium

UndervaluedFair: $0.75Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CWT1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

GWRS1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
2.4x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

CWT4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.004/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
7.7%3/10

ROE of 7.7% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-100.0%2/10

Revenue declined 100.0%

GWRS4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
2.2%4/10

2.2% revenue growth

Market CapQuality
$215.10M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
4.4%3/10

ROE of 4.4% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
5.3%3/10

5.3% margin — thin

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CWT

The strongest argument for CWT centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : GWRS

The strongest argument for GWRS centers on Price/Book.

Bear Case : CWT

The primary concerns for CWT are PEG Ratio, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : GWRS

The primary concerns for GWRS are Revenue Growth, Market Cap, Return on Equity. A P/E of 68.0x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CWT profiles as a declining stock while GWRS is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

GWRS carries more volatility with a beta of 0.99 — expect wider price swings.

GWRS is growing revenue faster at 2.2% — sustainability is the question.

GWRS generates stronger free cash flow (-15M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CWT scores higher overall (47/100 vs 34/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

California Water Service Group

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED WATER · USA

California Water Service Group provides public water and related services in California, Washington, New Mexico and Hawaii. The company is headquartered in San Jose, California.

Visit Website →

Global Water Resources Inc

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED WATER · USA

Global Water Resources, Inc., a water resources management company, owns, operates and manages regulated water, wastewater and recycled water services primarily in the Phoenix, Arizona metropolitan area. The company is headquartered in Phoenix, Arizona.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?