WallStSmart

California Water Service Group (CWT)vsStarbucks Corporation (SBUX)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Starbucks Corporation generates 3706% more annual revenue ($38.47B vs $1.01B). CWT leads profitability with a 11.8% profit margin vs 3.9%. SBUX appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.78. CWT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 53/100 (C-).

CWT

Buy

53

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 5.0Value: 6.7Quality: 2.8
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 0.74

SBUX

Hold

49

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 6.7Profit: 5.0Value: 4.7Quality: 4.3
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.07
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CWTUndervalued (+30.3%)

Margin of Safety

+30.3%

Fair Value

$63.31

Current Price

$43.03

$20.28 discount

UndervaluedFair: $63.31Overvalued
SBUXUndervalued (+26.6%)

Margin of Safety

+26.6%

Fair Value

$135.09

Current Price

$106.44

$28.65 discount

UndervaluedFair: $135.09Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CWT1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

SBUX2 strengths · Avg: 8.5/10
Market CapQuality
$119.63B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

EPS GrowthGrowth
32.6%8/10

Earnings expanding 32.6% YoY

Areas to Watch

CWT4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.934/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
7.2%3/10

ROE of 7.2% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-69.3%2/10

Earnings declined 69.3%

SBUX4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.784/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
0.0%3/10

ROE of 0.0% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
3.9%3/10

3.9% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CWT

The strongest argument for CWT centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : SBUX

The strongest argument for SBUX centers on Market Cap, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : CWT

The primary concerns for CWT are PEG Ratio, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : SBUX

The primary concerns for SBUX are PEG Ratio, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. A P/E of 80.8x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 3.9% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

SBUX carries more volatility with a beta of 1.01 — expect wider price swings.

SBUX is growing revenue faster at 8.8% — sustainability is the question.

SBUX generates stronger free cash flow (92M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor UTILITIES - REGULATED WATER industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

CWT scores higher overall (53/100 vs 49/100). SBUX offers better value entry with a 26.6% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

California Water Service Group

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED WATER · USA

California Water Service Group provides public water and related services in California, Washington, New Mexico and Hawaii. The company is headquartered in San Jose, California.

Visit Website →

Starbucks Corporation

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESTAURANTS · USA

Starbucks Corporation is an American multinational chain of coffeehouses and roastery reserves headquartered in Seattle, Washington. As the world's largest coffeehouse chain, Starbucks is seen to be the main representation of the United States' second wave of coffee culture.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?