WallStSmart

California Water Service Group (CWT)vsSea Ltd (SE)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Sea Ltd generates 2169% more annual revenue ($22.94B vs $1.01B). CWT leads profitability with a 11.8% profit margin vs 6.9%. SE appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.60. SE earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 70/100 (B-).

CWT

Buy

53

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 5.0Value: 6.7Quality: 2.8
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 0.74

SE

Strong Buy

70

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 10.0Profit: 6.0Value: 7.3Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 6/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CWTUndervalued (+30.3%)

Margin of Safety

+30.3%

Fair Value

$63.31

Current Price

$43.03

$20.28 discount

UndervaluedFair: $63.31Overvalued
SEUndervalued (+52.8%)

Margin of Safety

+52.8%

Fair Value

$242.40

Current Price

$90.02

$152.38 discount

UndervaluedFair: $242.40Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CWT1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

SE4 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
38.4%10/10

Revenue surging 38.4% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
58.2%10/10

Earnings expanding 58.2% YoY

Market CapQuality
$52.80B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

PEG RatioValuation
0.608/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Areas to Watch

CWT4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.934/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
7.2%3/10

ROE of 7.2% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-69.3%2/10

Earnings declined 69.3%

SE3 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
34.2x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Profit MarginProfitability
6.9%3/10

6.9% margin — thin

Free Cash FlowQuality
$02/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CWT

The strongest argument for CWT centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : SE

The strongest argument for SE centers on Revenue Growth, EPS Growth, Market Cap. Revenue growth of 38.4% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.60 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : CWT

The primary concerns for CWT are PEG Ratio, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : SE

The primary concerns for SE are P/E Ratio, Profit Margin, Free Cash Flow.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CWT profiles as a value stock while SE is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

SE carries more volatility with a beta of 1.70 — expect wider price swings.

SE is growing revenue faster at 38.4% — sustainability is the question.

Monitor UTILITIES - REGULATED WATER industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

SE scores higher overall (70/100 vs 53/100) and 38.4% revenue growth. CWT offers better value entry with a 30.3% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

California Water Service Group

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED WATER · USA

California Water Service Group provides public water and related services in California, Washington, New Mexico and Hawaii. The company is headquartered in San Jose, California.

Visit Website →

Sea Ltd

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · INTERNET RETAIL · USA

Sea Limited is engaged in the digital entertainment, e-commerce and digital financial services businesses in Southeast Asia, Latin America, the rest of Asia and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?