WallStSmart

California Water Service Group (CWT)vsShell PLC ADR (SHEL)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Shell PLC ADR generates 26305% more annual revenue ($266.89B vs $1.01B). CWT leads profitability with a 11.8% profit margin vs 6.7%. SHEL appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.31. SHEL earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 61/100 (C+).

CWT

Buy

53

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 5.0Value: 6.7Quality: 2.8
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 0.74

SHEL

Buy

61

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 5.5Value: 6.7Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.34
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CWTUndervalued (+30.3%)

Margin of Safety

+30.3%

Fair Value

$63.31

Current Price

$43.03

$20.28 discount

UndervaluedFair: $63.31Overvalued
SHELUndervalued (+4.3%)

Margin of Safety

+4.3%

Fair Value

$84.45

Current Price

$88.98

$4.53 discount

UndervaluedFair: $84.45Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CWT1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

SHEL5 strengths · Avg: 9.2/10
Market CapQuality
$252.85B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Price/BookValuation
1.5x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
376.2%10/10

Earnings expanding 376.2% YoY

P/E RatioValuation
15.1x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Free Cash FlowQuality
$3.45B8/10

Generating 3.4B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

CWT4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.934/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
7.2%3/10

ROE of 7.2% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-69.3%2/10

Earnings declined 69.3%

SHEL2 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
6.7%3/10

6.7% margin — thin

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-3.3%2/10

Revenue declined 3.3%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CWT

The strongest argument for CWT centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : SHEL

The strongest argument for SHEL centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, EPS Growth. PEG of 1.31 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : CWT

The primary concerns for CWT are PEG Ratio, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : SHEL

The primary concerns for SHEL are Profit Margin, Revenue Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CWT carries more volatility with a beta of 0.61 — expect wider price swings.

CWT is growing revenue faster at 5.2% — sustainability is the question.

SHEL generates stronger free cash flow (3.4B), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor UTILITIES - REGULATED WATER industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

SHEL scores higher overall (61/100 vs 53/100). CWT offers better value entry with a 30.3% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

California Water Service Group

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED WATER · USA

California Water Service Group provides public water and related services in California, Washington, New Mexico and Hawaii. The company is headquartered in San Jose, California.

Visit Website →

Shell PLC ADR

ENERGY · OIL & GAS INTEGRATED · USA

Shell plc is a global petrochemical and energy company. The company is headquartered in The Hague, the Netherlands.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?