WallStSmart

California Water Service Group (CWT)vsSony Group Corp (SONY)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Sony Group Corp generates 1302934% more annual revenue ($13.17T vs $1.01B). CWT leads profitability with a 11.8% profit margin vs -1.6%. CWT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.93. CWT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 53/100 (C-).

CWT

Buy

53

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 5.0Value: 6.7Quality: 2.8
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 0.74

SONY

Hold

47

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 5.0Value: 5.0Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CWTUndervalued (+30.3%)

Margin of Safety

+30.3%

Fair Value

$63.31

Current Price

$43.03

$20.28 discount

UndervaluedFair: $63.31Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for SONY.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CWT1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

SONY4 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Free Cash FlowQuality
$898.45B10/10

Generating 898.5B in free cash flow

Market CapQuality
$118.69B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

P/E RatioValuation
15.6x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.3x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

CWT4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.934/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
7.2%3/10

ROE of 7.2% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-69.3%2/10

Earnings declined 69.3%

SONY3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
0.5%4/10

0.5% revenue growth

PEG RatioValuation
2.712/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Profit MarginProfitability
-1.6%1/10

Currently unprofitable

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CWT

The strongest argument for CWT centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : SONY

The strongest argument for SONY centers on Free Cash Flow, Market Cap, P/E Ratio.

Bear Case : CWT

The primary concerns for CWT are PEG Ratio, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : SONY

The primary concerns for SONY are Revenue Growth, PEG Ratio, Profit Margin.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CWT profiles as a value stock while SONY is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

SONY carries more volatility with a beta of 0.75 — expect wider price swings.

CWT is growing revenue faster at 5.2% — sustainability is the question.

SONY generates stronger free cash flow (898.5B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CWT scores higher overall (53/100 vs 47/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

California Water Service Group

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED WATER · USA

California Water Service Group provides public water and related services in California, Washington, New Mexico and Hawaii. The company is headquartered in San Jose, California.

Visit Website →

Sony Group Corp

TECHNOLOGY · CONSUMER ELECTRONICS · USA

Sony Group Corporation designs, develops, produces and sells electronic equipment, instruments and devices for the consumer, professional and industrial markets worldwide. The company is headquartered in Tokyo, Japan.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?