WallStSmart

California Water Service Group (CWT)vsAT&T Inc (T)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

AT&T Inc generates 12418% more annual revenue ($126.53B vs $1.01B). T leads profitability with a 16.9% profit margin vs 11.8%. T appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.82. T earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).

CWT

Buy

53

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 5.0Value: 6.7Quality: 2.8
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 0.74

T

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 3.3Profit: 7.5Value: 7.3Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CWTUndervalued (+30.3%)

Margin of Safety

+30.3%

Fair Value

$63.31

Current Price

$43.03

$20.28 discount

UndervaluedFair: $63.31Overvalued
TUndervalued (+20.5%)

Margin of Safety

+20.5%

Fair Value

$32.17

Current Price

$25.57

$6.60 discount

UndervaluedFair: $32.17Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CWT1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

T5 strengths · Avg: 8.6/10
P/E RatioValuation
8.6x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Market CapQuality
$181.49B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
1.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
22.7%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 22.7%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$2.68B8/10

Generating 2.7B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

CWT4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.934/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
7.2%3/10

ROE of 7.2% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-69.3%2/10

Earnings declined 69.3%

T3 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.824/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
2.9%4/10

2.9% revenue growth

EPS GrowthGrowth
-11.3%2/10

Earnings declined 11.3%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CWT

The strongest argument for CWT centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : T

The strongest argument for T centers on P/E Ratio, Market Cap, Price/Book. Profitability is solid with margins at 16.9% and operating margin at 22.7%.

Bear Case : CWT

The primary concerns for CWT are PEG Ratio, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : T

The primary concerns for T are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CWT carries more volatility with a beta of 0.61 — expect wider price swings.

CWT is growing revenue faster at 5.2% — sustainability is the question.

T generates stronger free cash flow (2.7B), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor UTILITIES - REGULATED WATER industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

T scores higher overall (64/100 vs 53/100), backed by strong 16.9% margins. CWT offers better value entry with a 30.3% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

California Water Service Group

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED WATER · USA

California Water Service Group provides public water and related services in California, Washington, New Mexico and Hawaii. The company is headquartered in San Jose, California.

Visit Website →

AT&T Inc

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · TELECOM SERVICES · USA

AT&T Inc. is an American multinational conglomerate holding company, Delaware-registered but headquartered at Whitacre Tower in Downtown Dallas, Texas. It is the world largest telecommunications company, and the second largest provider of mobile telephone services.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?