WallStSmart

California Water Service Group (CWT)vsUBS Group AG (UBS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

UBS Group AG generates 4977% more annual revenue ($51.31B vs $1.01B). UBS leads profitability with a 17.8% profit margin vs 11.8%. UBS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.52. UBS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 79/100 (B+).

CWT

Buy

53

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 5.0Value: 6.7Quality: 2.8
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 0.74

UBS

Strong Buy

79

out of 100

Grade: B+

Growth: 8.0Profit: 7.0Value: 7.0Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CWTUndervalued (+30.3%)

Margin of Safety

+30.3%

Fair Value

$63.31

Current Price

$43.03

$20.28 discount

UndervaluedFair: $63.31Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for UBS.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CWT1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

UBS6 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Operating MarginProfitability
31.5%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 31.5%

EPS GrowthGrowth
84.4%10/10

Earnings expanding 84.4% YoY

Market CapQuality
$134.56B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

PEG RatioValuation
0.528/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

P/E RatioValuation
15.5x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

CWT4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.934/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
7.2%3/10

ROE of 7.2% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-69.3%2/10

Earnings declined 69.3%

UBS0 concerns · Avg: 0/10

No major concerns identified

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CWT

The strongest argument for CWT centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : UBS

The strongest argument for UBS centers on Operating Margin, EPS Growth, Market Cap. Profitability is solid with margins at 17.8% and operating margin at 31.5%. Revenue growth of 13.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CWT

The primary concerns for CWT are PEG Ratio, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : UBS

No major red flags identified for UBS, but monitor valuation.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CWT profiles as a value stock while UBS is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

UBS carries more volatility with a beta of 0.83 — expect wider price swings.

UBS is growing revenue faster at 13.8% — sustainability is the question.

Monitor UTILITIES - REGULATED WATER industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

UBS scores higher overall (79/100 vs 53/100), backed by strong 17.8% margins and 13.8% revenue growth. CWT offers better value entry with a 30.3% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

California Water Service Group

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED WATER · USA

California Water Service Group provides public water and related services in California, Washington, New Mexico and Hawaii. The company is headquartered in San Jose, California.

Visit Website →

UBS Group AG

FINANCIAL SERVICES · BANKS - DIVERSIFIED · USA

UBS Group AG, provides advice and financial solutions to private, institutional and corporate clients worldwide. The company is headquartered in Zurich, Switzerland.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?