WallStSmart

Edible Garden AG Inc (EDBL)vsTarget Corporation (TGT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Target Corporation generates 778284% more annual revenue ($107.70B vs $13.84M). TGT leads profitability with a 4.1% profit margin vs -122.1%. TGT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 66/100 (B-).

EDBL

Avoid

29

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.7Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: -5.05

TGT

Strong Buy

66

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 6.0Profit: 6.0Value: 6.0Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.47
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for EDBL.

TGTUndervalued (+5.3%)

Margin of Safety

+5.3%

Fair Value

$120.98

Current Price

$155.83

$34.85 discount

UndervaluedFair: $120.98Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

EDBL0 strengths · Avg: 0/10

No standout strengths identified

TGT5 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
100.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 100.5% YoY

Market CapQuality
$70.79B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
24.6%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 25 in profit

P/E RatioValuation
16.2x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Free Cash FlowQuality
$2.43B8/10

Generating 2.4B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

EDBL4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$2.85M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-328.8%2/10

ROE of -328.8% — below average capital efficiency

TGT4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.944/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Profit MarginProfitability
4.1%3/10

4.1% margin — thin

Debt/EquityHealth
1.053/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : EDBL

Revenue growth of 12.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : TGT

The strongest argument for TGT centers on EPS Growth, Market Cap, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : EDBL

The primary concerns for EDBL are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : TGT

The primary concerns for TGT are PEG Ratio, Profit Margin, Debt/Equity. Thin 4.1% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

EDBL profiles as a turnaround stock while TGT is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

EDBL carries more volatility with a beta of 1.78 — expect wider price swings.

EDBL is growing revenue faster at 12.8% — sustainability is the question.

TGT generates stronger free cash flow (2.4B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

TGT scores higher overall (66/100 vs 29/100). Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Edible Garden AG Inc

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · FARM PRODUCTS · USA

Edible Garden AG Incorporated and its subsidiaries operate as a controlled environment agricultural company. The company is headquartered in Belvidere, New Jersey.

Target Corporation

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · DISCOUNT STORES · USA

Target Corporation is an American retail corporation. Their retail formats include the discount store Target, the hypermarket SuperTarget, and small-format stores previously named CityTarget and TargetExpress before being consolidated under the Target branding.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?