WallStSmart

Estee Lauder Companies Inc (EL)vsQnity Electronics, Inc (Q)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Estee Lauder Companies Inc generates 212% more annual revenue ($14.83B vs $4.75B). Q leads profitability with a 14.6% profit margin vs -1.7%. EL appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.43. Q earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 49/100 (D+).

EL

Hold

38

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.7Profit: 4.0Value: 7.0Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.68

Q

Hold

49

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 3.3Profit: 6.0Value: 3.3Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

ELUndervalued (+35.7%)

Margin of Safety

+35.7%

Fair Value

$163.80

Current Price

$86.20

$77.60 discount

UndervaluedFair: $163.80Overvalued
QOvervalued (-9.0%)

Margin of Safety

-9.0%

Fair Value

$105.09

Current Price

$143.59

$38.50 premium

UndervaluedFair: $105.09Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

EL0 strengths · Avg: 0/10

No standout strengths identified

Q1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Operating MarginProfitability
20.4%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 20.4%

Areas to Watch

EL4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.6%4/10

4.6% revenue growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.684/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-6.0%2/10

ROE of -6.0% — below average capital efficiency

Q4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Return on EquityProfitability
8.0%3/10

ROE of 8.0% — below average capital efficiency

PEG RatioValuation
2.862/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
43.5x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
-52.8%2/10

Earnings declined 52.8%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : EL

PEG of 1.43 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : Q

The strongest argument for Q centers on Operating Margin.

Bear Case : EL

The primary concerns for EL are Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score, Piotroski F-Score. Debt-to-equity of 2.74 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : Q

The primary concerns for Q are Return on Equity, PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 43.5x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

EL profiles as a turnaround stock while Q is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

Q is growing revenue faster at 8.1% — sustainability is the question.

Q generates stronger free cash flow (420M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

Q scores higher overall (49/100 vs 38/100). EL offers better value entry with a 35.7% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Estee Lauder Companies Inc

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS · USA

The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. is an American multinational manufacturer and marketer of prestige skincare, makeup, fragrance and hair care products, based in Midtown Manhattan, New York City. The company owns a diverse portfolio of brands, distributed internationally through both digital commerce and retail channels.

Visit Website →

Qnity Electronics, Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SEMICONDUCTOR EQUIPMENT & MATERIALS · USA

IQVIA Holdings Inc. provides integrated information and technology-enabled healthcare services in the Americas, Europe, Africa, and Asia-Pacific. The company is headquartered in Durham, North Carolina.

Compare with Other HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS Stocks

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?