WallStSmart

Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL)vsQnity Electronics, Inc (Q)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Colgate-Palmolive Company generates 337% more annual revenue ($20.80B vs $4.75B). Q leads profitability with a 14.6% profit margin vs 10.0%. CL appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.55. CL earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 58/100 (C).

CL

Buy

58

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.0Profit: 8.5Value: 5.3Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 3/9

Q

Hold

49

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 3.3Profit: 6.0Value: 3.3Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CLUndervalued (+16.8%)

Margin of Safety

+16.8%

Fair Value

$104.97

Current Price

$87.55

$17.42 discount

UndervaluedFair: $104.97Overvalued
QOvervalued (-9.0%)

Margin of Safety

-9.0%

Fair Value

$105.09

Current Price

$143.59

$38.50 premium

UndervaluedFair: $105.09Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CL3 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
36.4%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 36 in profit

Market CapQuality
$69.90B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Operating MarginProfitability
20.9%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 20.9%

Q1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Operating MarginProfitability
20.4%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 20.4%

Areas to Watch

CL4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.554/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
33.9x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Price/BookValuation
1250.7x2/10

Trading at 1250.7x book value

Q4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Return on EquityProfitability
8.0%3/10

ROE of 8.0% — below average capital efficiency

PEG RatioValuation
2.862/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
43.5x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
-52.8%2/10

Earnings declined 52.8%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CL

The strongest argument for CL centers on Return on Equity, Market Cap, Operating Margin.

Bull Case : Q

The strongest argument for Q centers on Operating Margin.

Bear Case : CL

The primary concerns for CL are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Piotroski F-Score. Debt-to-equity of 147.93 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : Q

The primary concerns for Q are Return on Equity, PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 43.5x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CL is growing revenue faster at 8.4% — sustainability is the question.

CL generates stronger free cash flow (609M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

CL scores higher overall (58/100 vs 49/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Colgate-Palmolive Company

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS · USA

Colgate-Palmolive Company is an American multinational consumer products company headquartered on Park Avenue in Midtown Manhattan, New York City. It specializes in the production, distribution and provision of household, health care, personal care and veterinary products.

Visit Website →

Qnity Electronics, Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SEMICONDUCTOR EQUIPMENT & MATERIALS · USA

IQVIA Holdings Inc. provides integrated information and technology-enabled healthcare services in the Americas, Europe, Africa, and Asia-Pacific. The company is headquartered in Durham, North Carolina.

Compare with Other HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS Stocks

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?