WallStSmart

Estee Lauder Companies Inc (EL)vsTarget Corporation (TGT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Target Corporation generates 614% more annual revenue ($104.78B vs $14.67B). TGT leads profitability with a 3.5% profit margin vs -1.2%. EL appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.77. TGT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 46/100 (D+).

EL

Hold

41

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 3.3Profit: 4.0Value: 6.7Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.68

TGT

Hold

46

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.0Profit: 5.5Value: 4.7Quality: 5.3
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.48
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for EL.

TGTSignificantly Overvalued (-107.3%)

Margin of Safety

-107.3%

Fair Value

$55.28

Current Price

$116.37

$61.09 premium

UndervaluedFair: $55.28Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

EL1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.02B8/10

Generating 1.0B in free cash flow

TGT4 strengths · Avg: 8.5/10
Market CapQuality
$52.70B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
24.0%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 24 in profit

P/E RatioValuation
14.3x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Free Cash FlowQuality
$2.29B8/10

Generating 2.3B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

EL4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.774/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.684/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-4.3%2/10

ROE of -4.3% — below average capital efficiency

TGT4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
3.5%3/10

3.5% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
4.9%3/10

Operating margin of 4.9%

PEG RatioValuation
3.222/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-1.5%2/10

Revenue declined 1.5%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : EL

The strongest argument for EL centers on Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : TGT

The strongest argument for TGT centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, P/E Ratio.

Bear Case : EL

The primary concerns for EL are PEG Ratio, Altman Z-Score, Piotroski F-Score. Debt-to-equity of 2.74 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : TGT

The primary concerns for TGT are Profit Margin, Operating Margin, PEG Ratio. Thin 3.5% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

EL profiles as a turnaround stock while TGT is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

EL carries more volatility with a beta of 1.11 — expect wider price swings.

EL is growing revenue faster at 5.6% — sustainability is the question.

TGT generates stronger free cash flow (2.3B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

TGT scores higher overall (46/100 vs 41/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Estee Lauder Companies Inc

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS · USA

The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. is an American multinational manufacturer and marketer of prestige skincare, makeup, fragrance and hair care products, based in Midtown Manhattan, New York City. The company owns a diverse portfolio of brands, distributed internationally through both digital commerce and retail channels.

Visit Website →

Target Corporation

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · DISCOUNT STORES · USA

Target Corporation is an American retail corporation. Their retail formats include the discount store Target, the hypermarket SuperTarget, and small-format stores previously named CityTarget and TargetExpress before being consolidated under the Target branding.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?