WallStSmart

Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG)vsGulfport Energy Operating Corp (GPOR)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Diamondback Energy Inc generates 924% more annual revenue ($14.46B vs $1.41B). GPOR leads profitability with a 42.1% profit margin vs 2.0%. GPOR trades at a lower P/E of 5.5x. GPOR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 70/100 (B).

FANG

Hold

41

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 4.7Profit: 4.0Value: 4.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.28

GPOR

Strong Buy

70

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 4.7Profit: 10.0Value: 6.7Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.81
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FANGUndervalued (+40.9%)

Margin of Safety

+40.9%

Fair Value

$286.16

Current Price

$192.62

$93.54 discount

UndervaluedFair: $286.16Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for GPOR.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FANG2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Price/BookValuation
1.5x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Market CapQuality
$53.44B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

GPOR6 strengths · Avg: 9.7/10
P/E RatioValuation
5.5x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Return on EquityProfitability
32.9%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 33 in profit

Profit MarginProfitability
42.1%10/10

Keeps 42 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Operating MarginProfitability
50.9%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 50.9%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
32.3%10/10

Revenue surging 32.3% year-over-year

Price/BookValuation
1.7x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

FANG4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.2%4/10

4.2% revenue growth

Return on EquityProfitability
1.1%3/10

ROE of 1.1% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
2.0%3/10

2.0% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

GPOR1 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
-89.8%2/10

Earnings declined 89.8%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FANG

The strongest argument for FANG centers on Price/Book, Market Cap.

Bull Case : GPOR

The strongest argument for GPOR centers on P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 42.1% and operating margin at 50.9%. Revenue growth of 32.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : FANG

The primary concerns for FANG are Revenue Growth, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. A P/E of 191.9x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 2.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : GPOR

The primary concerns for GPOR are EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FANG profiles as a value stock while GPOR is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

GPOR carries more volatility with a beta of 0.40 — expect wider price swings.

GPOR is growing revenue faster at 32.3% — sustainability is the question.

FANG generates stronger free cash flow (895M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

GPOR scores higher overall (70/100 vs 41/100), backed by strong 42.1% margins and 32.3% revenue growth. FANG offers better value entry with a 40.9% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Diamondback Energy Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.

Gulfport Energy Operating Corp

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Gulfport Energy Corporation is engaged in the exploration, development, acquisition and production of natural gas, crude oil and natural gas liquids (NGL) in the United States. The company is headquartered in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?