WallStSmart

Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG)vsInteractive Brokers Group Inc (IBKR)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Diamondback Energy Inc generates 130% more annual revenue ($14.29B vs $6.21B). IBKR leads profitability with a 15.9% profit margin vs 11.6%. IBKR appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.32. IBKR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 66/100 (B-).

FANG

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 4.0Value: 4.7Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.24

IBKR

Strong Buy

66

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 9.3Profit: 7.5Value: 9.3Quality: 5.3
Piotroski: 2/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FANGSignificantly Overvalued (-29.4%)

Margin of Safety

-29.4%

Fair Value

$130.64

Current Price

$196.02

$65.38 premium

UndervaluedFair: $130.64Overvalued
IBKRUndervalued (+26.5%)

Margin of Safety

+26.5%

Fair Value

$103.90

Current Price

$68.68

$35.22 discount

UndervaluedFair: $103.90Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FANG3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$55.59B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
1.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.40B8/10

Generating 1.4B in free cash flow

IBKR6 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Operating MarginProfitability
78.8%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 78.8%

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0010/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Market CapQuality
$115.34B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
23.5%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 24 in profit

Revenue GrowthGrowth
15.2%8/10

15.2% revenue growth

EPS GrowthGrowth
30.3%8/10

Earnings expanding 30.3% YoY

Areas to Watch

FANG4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
34.4x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Return on EquityProfitability
3.7%3/10

ROE of 3.7% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
103.602/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

IBKR3 concerns · Avg: 3.7/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.324/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
30.6x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FANG

The strongest argument for FANG centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : IBKR

The strongest argument for IBKR centers on Operating Margin, Debt/Equity, Market Cap. Profitability is solid with margins at 15.9% and operating margin at 78.8%. Revenue growth of 15.2% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : FANG

The primary concerns for FANG are P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : IBKR

The primary concerns for IBKR are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FANG profiles as a declining stock while IBKR is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

IBKR carries more volatility with a beta of 1.25 — expect wider price swings.

IBKR is growing revenue faster at 15.2% — sustainability is the question.

IBKR generates stronger free cash flow (1.6B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

IBKR scores higher overall (66/100 vs 45/100), backed by strong 15.9% margins and 15.2% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Diamondback Energy Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.

Interactive Brokers Group Inc

FINANCIAL SERVICES · CAPITAL MARKETS · USA

Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. is a global automated electronic broker. The company is headquartered in Greenwich, Connecticut.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?