WallStSmart

Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG)vsKinder Morgan Inc (KMI)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Kinder Morgan Inc generates 21% more annual revenue ($17.52B vs $14.47B). KMI leads profitability with a 18.9% profit margin vs 2.0%. KMI appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 3.87. KMI earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).

FANG

Hold

41

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 5.3Profit: 4.0Value: 4.7Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.24

KMI

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 6.0Profit: 7.5Value: 3.3Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 4/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FANGUndervalued (+44.7%)

Margin of Safety

+44.7%

Fair Value

$305.77

Current Price

$188.70

$117.07 discount

UndervaluedFair: $305.77Overvalued
KMISignificantly Overvalued (-29.1%)

Margin of Safety

-29.1%

Fair Value

$24.36

Current Price

$31.41

$7.05 premium

UndervaluedFair: $24.36Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FANG2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Price/BookValuation
1.5x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Market CapQuality
$53.58B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

KMI4 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$70.13B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
2.2x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
29.9%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 29.9%

EPS GrowthGrowth
36.0%8/10

Earnings expanding 36.0% YoY

Areas to Watch

FANG4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
0.5%3/10

ROE of 0.5% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
2.0%3/10

2.0% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
57.132/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

KMI1 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
3.872/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FANG

The strongest argument for FANG centers on Price/Book, Market Cap.

Bull Case : KMI

The strongest argument for KMI centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 18.9% and operating margin at 29.9%. Revenue growth of 13.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : FANG

The primary concerns for FANG are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score. A P/E of 196.3x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 2.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : KMI

The primary concerns for KMI are PEG Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FANG profiles as a value stock while KMI is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

KMI carries more volatility with a beta of 0.56 — expect wider price swings.

KMI is growing revenue faster at 13.8% — sustainability is the question.

FANG generates stronger free cash flow (895M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

KMI scores higher overall (64/100 vs 41/100), backed by strong 18.9% margins and 13.8% revenue growth. FANG offers better value entry with a 44.7% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Diamondback Energy Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.

Kinder Morgan Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM · USA

Kinder Morgan, Inc. is one of the largest energy infrastructure companies in North America. The company specializes in owning and controlling oil and gas pipelines and terminals.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?