WallStSmart

Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG)vsKimbell Royalty Partners LP (KRP)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Diamondback Energy Inc generates 4343% more annual revenue ($14.29B vs $321.74M). KRP leads profitability with a 28.3% profit margin vs 11.6%. KRP trades at a lower P/E of 23.7x. KRP earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 51/100 (C-).

FANG

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 4.0Value: 4.7Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.24

KRP

Buy

51

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 8.0Value: 5.7Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 5/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FANGSignificantly Overvalued (-29.4%)

Margin of Safety

-29.4%

Fair Value

$130.64

Current Price

$196.02

$65.38 premium

UndervaluedFair: $130.64Overvalued
KRPSignificantly Overvalued (-236.0%)

Margin of Safety

-236.0%

Fair Value

$4.22

Current Price

$14.53

$10.31 premium

UndervaluedFair: $4.22Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FANG3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$55.59B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
1.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.40B8/10

Generating 1.4B in free cash flow

KRP3 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Operating MarginProfitability
42.3%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 42.3%

Profit MarginProfitability
28.3%9/10

Keeps 28 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Price/BookValuation
2.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

FANG4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
34.4x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Return on EquityProfitability
3.7%3/10

ROE of 3.7% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
103.602/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

KRP2 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$1.60B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

EPS GrowthGrowth
-15.2%2/10

Earnings declined 15.2%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FANG

The strongest argument for FANG centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : KRP

The strongest argument for KRP centers on Operating Margin, Profit Margin, Price/Book. Profitability is solid with margins at 28.3% and operating margin at 42.3%.

Bear Case : FANG

The primary concerns for FANG are P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : KRP

The primary concerns for KRP are Market Cap, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FANG profiles as a declining stock while KRP is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

FANG carries more volatility with a beta of 0.57 — expect wider price swings.

KRP is growing revenue faster at 8.8% — sustainability is the question.

FANG generates stronger free cash flow (1.4B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

KRP scores higher overall (51/100 vs 45/100), backed by strong 28.3% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Diamondback Energy Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.

Kimbell Royalty Partners LP

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP, acquires and owns mineral and royalty interests in oil and natural gas properties in the United States. The company is headquartered in Fort Worth, Texas.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?