Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG)vsEli Lilly and Company (LLY)
FANG
Diamondback Energy Inc
$196.02
-0.53%
ENERGY · Cap: $55.59B
LLY
Eli Lilly and Company
$916.31
+1.47%
HEALTHCARE · Cap: $808.22B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Eli Lilly and Company generates 356% more annual revenue ($65.18B vs $14.29B). LLY leads profitability with a 31.7% profit margin vs 11.6%. LLY appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.97. LLY earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 80/100 (A-).
FANG
Hold45
out of 100
Grade: D+
LLY
Exceptional Buy80
out of 100
Grade: A-
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
-29.4%
Fair Value
$130.64
Current Price
$196.02
$65.38 premium
Margin of Safety
+14.0%
Fair Value
$1065.17
Current Price
$916.31
$148.86 discount
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Large-cap with strong market position
Reasonable price relative to book value
Generating 1.4B in free cash flow
Mega-cap, among the largest globally
Every $100 of equity generates 101 in profit
Keeps 32 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Strong operational efficiency at 44.9%
Revenue surging 42.6% year-over-year
Earnings expanding 51.4% YoY
Areas to Watch
Premium valuation, high expectations priced in
ROE of 3.7% — below average capital efficiency
Weak financial health signals
Expensive relative to growth rate
Premium valuation, high expectations priced in
Elevated debt levels
Trading at 30.9x book value
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : FANG
The strongest argument for FANG centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Free Cash Flow.
Bull Case : LLY
The strongest argument for LLY centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 31.7% and operating margin at 44.9%. Revenue growth of 42.6% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bear Case : FANG
The primary concerns for FANG are P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.
Bear Case : LLY
The primary concerns for LLY are P/E Ratio, Debt/Equity, Price/Book. Debt-to-equity of 1.60 is elevated, increasing financial risk.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
FANG profiles as a declining stock while LLY is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.
FANG carries more volatility with a beta of 0.57 — expect wider price swings.
LLY is growing revenue faster at 42.6% — sustainability is the question.
FANG generates stronger free cash flow (1.4B), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
LLY scores higher overall (80/100 vs 45/100), backed by strong 31.7% margins and 42.6% revenue growth. Both earn "Exceptional Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Diamondback Energy Inc
ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA
Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.
Eli Lilly and Company
HEALTHCARE · DRUG MANUFACTURERS - GENERAL · USA
Eli Lilly and Company is an American pharmaceutical company headquartered in Indianapolis, Indiana, with offices in 18 countries. Its products are sold in approximately 125 countries.
Visit Website →Compare with Other OIL & GAS E&P Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?