WallStSmart

Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG)vsLG Display Co Ltd (LPL)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

LG Display Co Ltd generates 174550% more annual revenue ($25.28T vs $14.47B). FANG leads profitability with a 2.0% profit margin vs -0.3%. LPL appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 6.56. FANG earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 41/100 (D).

FANG

Hold

41

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 5.3Profit: 4.0Value: 4.7Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.24

LPL

Hold

36

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 3.5Value: 4.3Quality: 3.8
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 0.82
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FANGUndervalued (+44.6%)

Margin of Safety

+44.6%

Fair Value

$305.11

Current Price

$196.15

$108.96 discount

UndervaluedFair: $305.11Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for LPL.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FANG2 strengths · Avg: 8.5/10
Market CapQuality
$53.58B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
1.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

LPL2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.0x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.18T10/10

Generating 1.2T in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

FANG4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
0.5%3/10

ROE of 0.5% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
2.0%3/10

2.0% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
57.132/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

LPL4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
29.1x4/10

Moderate valuation

Return on EquityProfitability
3.8%3/10

ROE of 3.8% — below average capital efficiency

Operating MarginProfitability
2.6%3/10

Operating margin of 2.6%

PEG RatioValuation
6.562/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FANG

The strongest argument for FANG centers on Market Cap, Price/Book.

Bull Case : LPL

The strongest argument for LPL centers on Price/Book, Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : FANG

The primary concerns for FANG are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score. A P/E of 196.3x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 2.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : LPL

The primary concerns for LPL are P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Operating Margin.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FANG profiles as a value stock while LPL is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

LPL carries more volatility with a beta of 1.12 — expect wider price swings.

FANG is growing revenue faster at 9.1% — sustainability is the question.

LPL generates stronger free cash flow (1.2T), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

FANG scores higher overall (41/100 vs 36/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Diamondback Energy Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.

LG Display Co Ltd

TECHNOLOGY · CONSUMER ELECTRONICS · USA

LG Display Co., Ltd. is dedicated to the design, manufacture and sale of thin film transistor liquid crystal displays (TFT-LCD) and display panels based on organic light emitting diode (OLED) technology. The company is headquartered in Seoul, South Korea.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?