WallStSmart

Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG)vsMagnite Inc (MGNI)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Diamondback Energy Inc generates 1902% more annual revenue ($14.29B vs $713.95M). MGNI leads profitability with a 20.3% profit margin vs 11.6%. MGNI trades at a lower P/E of 12.8x. MGNI earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 68/100 (B-).

FANG

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 4.0Value: 4.7Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.24

MGNI

Strong Buy

68

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 7.3Profit: 7.5Value: 8.3Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FANGSignificantly Overvalued (-29.4%)

Margin of Safety

-29.4%

Fair Value

$130.64

Current Price

$196.02

$65.38 premium

UndervaluedFair: $130.64Overvalued
MGNIUndervalued (+73.5%)

Margin of Safety

+73.5%

Fair Value

$44.46

Current Price

$12.11

$32.35 discount

UndervaluedFair: $44.46Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FANG3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$55.59B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
1.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.40B8/10

Generating 1.4B in free cash flow

MGNI5 strengths · Avg: 8.6/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
230.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 230.0% YoY

Profit MarginProfitability
20.3%9/10

Keeps 20 of every $100 in revenue as profit

P/E RatioValuation
12.8x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
25.4%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 25.4%

Areas to Watch

FANG4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
34.4x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Return on EquityProfitability
3.7%3/10

ROE of 3.7% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
103.602/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

MGNI1 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Market CapQuality
$1.75B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FANG

The strongest argument for FANG centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : MGNI

The strongest argument for MGNI centers on EPS Growth, Profit Margin, P/E Ratio. Profitability is solid with margins at 20.3% and operating margin at 25.4%.

Bear Case : FANG

The primary concerns for FANG are P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : MGNI

The primary concerns for MGNI are Market Cap.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FANG profiles as a declining stock while MGNI is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

MGNI carries more volatility with a beta of 2.40 — expect wider price swings.

MGNI is growing revenue faster at 5.9% — sustainability is the question.

FANG generates stronger free cash flow (1.4B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

MGNI scores higher overall (68/100 vs 45/100), backed by strong 20.3% margins. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Diamondback Energy Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.

Magnite Inc

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · ADVERTISING AGENCIES · USA

Magnite, Inc. operates an independent sales advertising platform in the United States and internationally. The company is headquartered in Los Angeles, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?