WallStSmart

Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG)vsPermian Resources Corporation (PR)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Diamondback Energy Inc generates 182% more annual revenue ($14.29B vs $5.07B). PR leads profitability with a 18.5% profit margin vs 11.6%. PR appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 4.79. PR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 65/100 (C+).

FANG

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 4.0Value: 4.7Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.24

PR

Buy

65

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 7.3Profit: 7.5Value: 7.3Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.69
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FANGSignificantly Overvalued (-29.4%)

Margin of Safety

-29.4%

Fair Value

$130.64

Current Price

$196.02

$65.38 premium

UndervaluedFair: $130.64Overvalued
PRUndervalued (+71.3%)

Margin of Safety

+71.3%

Fair Value

$59.90

Current Price

$20.92

$38.98 discount

UndervaluedFair: $59.90Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FANG3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$55.59B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
1.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.40B8/10

Generating 1.4B in free cash flow

PR4 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Operating MarginProfitability
41.0%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 41.0%

EPS GrowthGrowth
51.6%10/10

Earnings expanding 51.6% YoY

P/E RatioValuation
16.2x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

FANG4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
34.4x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Return on EquityProfitability
3.7%3/10

ROE of 3.7% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
103.602/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

PR4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.694/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
4.792/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-9.8%2/10

Revenue declined 9.8%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FANG

The strongest argument for FANG centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : PR

The strongest argument for PR centers on Operating Margin, EPS Growth, P/E Ratio. Profitability is solid with margins at 18.5% and operating margin at 41.0%.

Bear Case : FANG

The primary concerns for FANG are P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : PR

The primary concerns for PR are Altman Z-Score, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

PR carries more volatility with a beta of 0.64 — expect wider price swings.

FANG is growing revenue faster at -9.4% — sustainability is the question.

FANG generates stronger free cash flow (1.4B), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor OIL & GAS E&P industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

PR scores higher overall (65/100 vs 45/100), backed by strong 18.5% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Diamondback Energy Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.

Permian Resources Corporation

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Permian Resources Corporation, an independent oil and natural gas company, focuses on the development of crude oil and related liquid-rich natural gas reserves in the United States. The company is headquartered in Midland, Texas.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?