Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG)vsRestaurant Brands International Inc (QSR)
FANG
Diamondback Energy Inc
$196.02
-0.53%
ENERGY · Cap: $55.59B
QSR
Restaurant Brands International Inc
$72.92
-1.26%
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · Cap: $33.67B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Diamondback Energy Inc generates 52% more annual revenue ($14.29B vs $9.43B). FANG leads profitability with a 11.6% profit margin vs 8.2%. QSR appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.16. QSR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 57/100 (C).
FANG
Hold45
out of 100
Grade: D+
QSR
Buy57
out of 100
Grade: C
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
-29.4%
Fair Value
$130.64
Current Price
$196.02
$65.38 premium
Margin of Safety
-295.4%
Fair Value
$17.88
Current Price
$72.92
$55.04 premium
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Large-cap with strong market position
Reasonable price relative to book value
Generating 1.4B in free cash flow
Every $100 of equity generates 24 in profit
Strong operational efficiency at 26.4%
Areas to Watch
Premium valuation, high expectations priced in
ROE of 3.7% — below average capital efficiency
Weak financial health signals
Expensive relative to growth rate
Moderate valuation
Earnings declined 57.4%
Distress zone — elevated risk
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : FANG
The strongest argument for FANG centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Free Cash Flow.
Bull Case : QSR
The strongest argument for QSR centers on Return on Equity, Operating Margin. PEG of 1.16 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bear Case : FANG
The primary concerns for FANG are P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.
Bear Case : QSR
The primary concerns for QSR are P/E Ratio, EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
FANG profiles as a declining stock while QSR is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.
FANG carries more volatility with a beta of 0.57 — expect wider price swings.
QSR is growing revenue faster at 7.4% — sustainability is the question.
FANG generates stronger free cash flow (1.4B), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
QSR scores higher overall (57/100 vs 45/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Diamondback Energy Inc
ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA
Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.
Restaurant Brands International Inc
CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESTAURANTS · USA
Restaurant Brands International Inc. owns, operates and franchises quick-service restaurants under the Tim Hortons (TH), Burger King (BK) and Popeyes (PLK) brands. The company is headquartered in Toronto, Canada.
Compare with Other OIL & GAS E&P Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?