WallStSmart

Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG)vsEchoStar Corporation (SATS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

EchoStar Corporation generates 4% more annual revenue ($15.00B vs $14.47B). FANG leads profitability with a 2.0% profit margin vs -96.6%. SATS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.34. FANG earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 41/100 (D).

FANG

Hold

41

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 5.3Profit: 4.0Value: 4.7Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.24

SATS

Avoid

34

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 3.0Value: 7.0Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: -0.08
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FANGUndervalued (+44.7%)

Margin of Safety

+44.7%

Fair Value

$305.77

Current Price

$188.70

$117.07 discount

UndervaluedFair: $305.77Overvalued
SATSUndervalued (+66.0%)

Margin of Safety

+66.0%

Fair Value

$323.23

Current Price

$127.15

$196.08 discount

UndervaluedFair: $323.23Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FANG2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Price/BookValuation
1.5x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Market CapQuality
$53.58B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

SATS0 strengths · Avg: 0/10

No standout strengths identified

Areas to Watch

FANG4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
0.5%3/10

ROE of 0.5% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
2.0%3/10

2.0% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
57.132/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

SATS4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-111.3%2/10

ROE of -111.3% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-4.3%2/10

Revenue declined 4.3%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-85.6%2/10

Earnings declined 85.6%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FANG

The strongest argument for FANG centers on Price/Book, Market Cap.

Bull Case : SATS

PEG of 1.34 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : FANG

The primary concerns for FANG are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score. A P/E of 196.3x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 2.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : SATS

The primary concerns for SATS are Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity, Revenue Growth. Debt-to-equity of 4.40 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FANG profiles as a value stock while SATS is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

SATS carries more volatility with a beta of 0.96 — expect wider price swings.

FANG is growing revenue faster at 9.1% — sustainability is the question.

FANG generates stronger free cash flow (895M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

FANG scores higher overall (41/100 vs 34/100). SATS offers better value entry with a 66.0% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Diamondback Energy Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.

EchoStar Corporation

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · TELECOM SERVICES · USA

EchoStar Corporation provides broadband satellite technologies and broadband Internet services. The company is headquartered in Englewood, Colorado.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?