WallStSmart

Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG)vsTE Connectivity Ltd (TEL)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

TE Connectivity Ltd generates 27% more annual revenue ($18.09B vs $14.29B). FANG leads profitability with a 11.6% profit margin vs 11.4%. TEL appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.14. TEL earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 74/100 (B).

FANG

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 4.0Value: 4.7Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.24

TEL

Strong Buy

74

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 7.3Profit: 7.5Value: 9.3Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FANGSignificantly Overvalued (-29.4%)

Margin of Safety

-29.4%

Fair Value

$130.64

Current Price

$196.02

$65.38 premium

UndervaluedFair: $130.64Overvalued
TELUndervalued (+29.8%)

Margin of Safety

+29.8%

Fair Value

$325.26

Current Price

$206.37

$118.89 discount

UndervaluedFair: $325.26Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FANG3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$55.59B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
1.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.40B8/10

Generating 1.4B in free cash flow

TEL4 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$60.58B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Operating MarginProfitability
20.9%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 20.9%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
21.7%8/10

Revenue surging 21.7% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
44.4%8/10

Earnings expanding 44.4% YoY

Areas to Watch

FANG4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
34.4x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Return on EquityProfitability
3.7%3/10

ROE of 3.7% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
103.602/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

TEL1 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
29.7x4/10

Moderate valuation

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FANG

The strongest argument for FANG centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : TEL

The strongest argument for TEL centers on Market Cap, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 21.7% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.14 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : FANG

The primary concerns for FANG are P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : TEL

The primary concerns for TEL are P/E Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FANG profiles as a declining stock while TEL is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

TEL carries more volatility with a beta of 1.25 — expect wider price swings.

TEL is growing revenue faster at 21.7% — sustainability is the question.

FANG generates stronger free cash flow (1.4B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

TEL scores higher overall (74/100 vs 45/100) and 21.7% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Diamondback Energy Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.

TE Connectivity Ltd

TECHNOLOGY · ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS · USA

TE Connectivity is an American Swiss-domiciled technology company that designs and manufactures connectors and sensors for several industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, data communication systems, aerospace, defense, medical, oil and gas, consumer electronics and energy.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?