WallStSmart

Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG)vsToyota Motor Corporation ADR (TM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Toyota Motor Corporation ADR generates 352826% more annual revenue ($50.45T vs $14.29B). FANG leads profitability with a 11.6% profit margin vs 7.3%. TM appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.54. TM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 53/100 (C-).

FANG

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 4.0Value: 4.7Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.24

TM

Buy

53

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 5.0Value: 7.3Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FANGSignificantly Overvalued (-29.4%)

Margin of Safety

-29.4%

Fair Value

$130.64

Current Price

$196.02

$65.38 premium

UndervaluedFair: $130.64Overvalued
TMSignificantly Overvalued (-96.6%)

Margin of Safety

-96.6%

Fair Value

$121.38

Current Price

$210.93

$89.55 premium

UndervaluedFair: $121.38Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FANG3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$55.59B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
1.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.40B8/10

Generating 1.4B in free cash flow

TM2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Market CapQuality
$273.41B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

P/E RatioValuation
11.8x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Areas to Watch

FANG4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
34.4x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Return on EquityProfitability
3.7%3/10

ROE of 3.7% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
103.602/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

TM4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.544/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
11.2x4/10

Trading at 11.2x book value

Profit MarginProfitability
7.3%3/10

7.3% margin — thin

EPS GrowthGrowth
-42.3%2/10

Earnings declined 42.3%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FANG

The strongest argument for FANG centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : TM

The strongest argument for TM centers on Market Cap, P/E Ratio.

Bear Case : FANG

The primary concerns for FANG are P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : TM

The primary concerns for TM are PEG Ratio, Price/Book, Profit Margin.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FANG profiles as a declining stock while TM is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

FANG carries more volatility with a beta of 0.57 — expect wider price swings.

TM is growing revenue faster at 8.6% — sustainability is the question.

FANG generates stronger free cash flow (1.4B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

TM scores higher overall (53/100 vs 45/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Diamondback Energy Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.

Toyota Motor Corporation ADR

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · AUTO MANUFACTURERS · USA

Toyota Motor Corporation designs, manufactures, assembles and sells passenger cars, minivans and commercial vehicles, and related parts and accessories. The company is headquartered in Toyota, Japan.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?