WallStSmart

Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG)vsTC Energy Corp (TRP)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

TC Energy Corp generates 7% more annual revenue ($15.24B vs $14.29B). TRP leads profitability with a 23.1% profit margin vs 11.6%. TRP appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 4.61. TRP earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 59/100 (C).

FANG

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 4.0Value: 4.7Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.24

TRP

Buy

59

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 6.0Profit: 7.5Value: 4.7Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 0.48
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FANGSignificantly Overvalued (-29.4%)

Margin of Safety

-29.4%

Fair Value

$130.64

Current Price

$196.02

$65.38 premium

UndervaluedFair: $130.64Overvalued
TRPSignificantly Overvalued (-216.8%)

Margin of Safety

-216.8%

Fair Value

$19.23

Current Price

$64.08

$44.85 premium

UndervaluedFair: $19.23Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FANG3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$55.59B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
1.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.40B8/10

Generating 1.4B in free cash flow

TRP4 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Operating MarginProfitability
45.4%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 45.4%

Market CapQuality
$66.54B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Profit MarginProfitability
23.1%9/10

Keeps 23 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Revenue GrowthGrowth
16.5%8/10

16.5% revenue growth

Areas to Watch

FANG4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
34.4x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Return on EquityProfitability
3.7%3/10

ROE of 3.7% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
103.602/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

TRP4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
25.3x4/10

Moderate valuation

EPS GrowthGrowth
0.5%4/10

0.5% earnings growth

PEG RatioValuation
4.612/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.482/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FANG

The strongest argument for FANG centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : TRP

The strongest argument for TRP centers on Operating Margin, Market Cap, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 23.1% and operating margin at 45.4%. Revenue growth of 16.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : FANG

The primary concerns for FANG are P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : TRP

The primary concerns for TRP are P/E Ratio, EPS Growth, PEG Ratio. Debt-to-equity of 2.23 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FANG profiles as a declining stock while TRP is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

TRP carries more volatility with a beta of 1.00 — expect wider price swings.

TRP is growing revenue faster at 16.5% — sustainability is the question.

FANG generates stronger free cash flow (1.4B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

TRP scores higher overall (59/100 vs 45/100), backed by strong 23.1% margins and 16.5% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Diamondback Energy Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.

TC Energy Corp

ENERGY · OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM · USA

TC Energy Corporation is an energy infrastructure company in North America. The company is headquartered in Calgary, Canada.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?