WallStSmart

Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG)vsTrade Desk Inc (TTD)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Diamondback Energy Inc generates 394% more annual revenue ($14.29B vs $2.90B). TTD leads profitability with a 15.3% profit margin vs 11.6%. TTD appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.86. TTD earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 72/100 (B).

FANG

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 4.0Value: 4.7Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.24

TTD

Strong Buy

72

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 7.3Profit: 8.0Value: 7.3Quality: 5.3
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.95
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FANGSignificantly Overvalued (-29.4%)

Margin of Safety

-29.4%

Fair Value

$130.64

Current Price

$196.02

$65.38 premium

UndervaluedFair: $130.64Overvalued
TTDSignificantly Overvalued (-60.9%)

Margin of Safety

-60.9%

Fair Value

$16.92

Current Price

$21.97

$5.05 premium

UndervaluedFair: $16.92Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FANG3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$55.59B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
1.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.40B8/10

Generating 1.4B in free cash flow

TTD2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Operating MarginProfitability
30.3%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 30.3%

PEG RatioValuation
0.868/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Areas to Watch

FANG4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
34.4x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Return on EquityProfitability
3.7%3/10

ROE of 3.7% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
103.602/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

TTD2 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.954/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FANG

The strongest argument for FANG centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : TTD

The strongest argument for TTD centers on Operating Margin, PEG Ratio. Profitability is solid with margins at 15.3% and operating margin at 30.3%. Revenue growth of 14.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : FANG

The primary concerns for FANG are P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : TTD

The primary concerns for TTD are Altman Z-Score, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FANG profiles as a declining stock while TTD is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

TTD carries more volatility with a beta of 1.19 — expect wider price swings.

TTD is growing revenue faster at 14.3% — sustainability is the question.

FANG generates stronger free cash flow (1.4B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

TTD scores higher overall (72/100 vs 45/100), backed by strong 15.3% margins and 14.3% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Diamondback Energy Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.

Trade Desk Inc

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · ADVERTISING AGENCIES · USA

Trade Desk, Inc. is a technology company in the United States and internationally. The company is headquartered in Ventura, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?