WallStSmart

Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG)vsTotalEnergies SE ADR (TTE)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

TotalEnergies SE ADR generates 1172% more annual revenue ($183.96B vs $14.46B). TTE leads profitability with a 8.2% profit margin vs 2.0%. TTE appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.72. TTE earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 72/100 (B).

FANG

Hold

41

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 4.7Profit: 4.0Value: 4.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.28

TTE

Strong Buy

72

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 5.3Profit: 6.5Value: 7.0Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.91
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FANGUndervalued (+41.1%)

Margin of Safety

+41.1%

Fair Value

$286.80

Current Price

$192.62

$94.18 discount

UndervaluedFair: $286.80Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for TTE.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FANG2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Price/BookValuation
1.5x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Market CapQuality
$56.94B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

TTE6 strengths · Avg: 8.5/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
57.1%10/10

Earnings expanding 57.1% YoY

Market CapQuality
$195.51B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

PEG RatioValuation
0.728/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

P/E RatioValuation
13.1x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.7x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
20.3%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 20.3%

Areas to Watch

FANG4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.2%4/10

4.2% revenue growth

Return on EquityProfitability
1.1%3/10

ROE of 1.1% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
2.0%3/10

2.0% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

TTE4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
3.4%4/10

3.4% revenue growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.914/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-1.24B2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FANG

The strongest argument for FANG centers on Price/Book, Market Cap.

Bull Case : TTE

The strongest argument for TTE centers on EPS Growth, Market Cap, PEG Ratio. PEG of 0.72 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : FANG

The primary concerns for FANG are Revenue Growth, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. A P/E of 208.7x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 2.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : TTE

The primary concerns for TTE are Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FANG carries more volatility with a beta of 0.44 — expect wider price swings.

FANG is growing revenue faster at 4.2% — sustainability is the question.

FANG generates stronger free cash flow (895M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor OIL & GAS E&P industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

TTE scores higher overall (72/100 vs 41/100). FANG offers better value entry with a 41.1% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Diamondback Energy Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.

TotalEnergies SE ADR

ENERGY · OIL & GAS INTEGRATED · USA

TotalEnergies SE is a global integrated oil and gas company. The company is headquartered in Paris, France.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?