WallStSmart

Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG)vsTradeweb Markets Inc (TW)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Diamondback Energy Inc generates 597% more annual revenue ($14.29B vs $2.05B). TW leads profitability with a 39.6% profit margin vs 11.6%. TW appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.97. TW earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 67/100 (B-).

FANG

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 4.0Value: 4.7Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.24

TW

Strong Buy

67

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 8.0Profit: 8.5Value: 7.3Quality: 7.8
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 5.64
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FANGSignificantly Overvalued (-29.4%)

Margin of Safety

-29.4%

Fair Value

$130.64

Current Price

$196.02

$65.38 premium

UndervaluedFair: $130.64Overvalued
TWUndervalued (+34.8%)

Margin of Safety

+34.8%

Fair Value

$176.44

Current Price

$119.95

$56.49 discount

UndervaluedFair: $176.44Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FANG3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$55.59B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
1.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.40B8/10

Generating 1.4B in free cash flow

TW4 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Profit MarginProfitability
39.6%10/10

Keeps 40 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Operating MarginProfitability
42.4%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 42.4%

EPS GrowthGrowth
128.8%10/10

Earnings expanding 128.8% YoY

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
5.6410/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Areas to Watch

FANG4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
34.4x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Return on EquityProfitability
3.7%3/10

ROE of 3.7% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
103.602/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

TW2 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
32.7x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

PEG RatioValuation
2.972/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FANG

The strongest argument for FANG centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : TW

The strongest argument for TW centers on Profit Margin, Operating Margin, EPS Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 39.6% and operating margin at 42.4%. Revenue growth of 12.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : FANG

The primary concerns for FANG are P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : TW

The primary concerns for TW are P/E Ratio, PEG Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FANG profiles as a declining stock while TW is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

TW carries more volatility with a beta of 0.78 — expect wider price swings.

TW is growing revenue faster at 12.5% — sustainability is the question.

FANG generates stronger free cash flow (1.4B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

TW scores higher overall (67/100 vs 45/100), backed by strong 39.6% margins and 12.5% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Diamondback Energy Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.

Tradeweb Markets Inc

FINANCIAL SERVICES · CAPITAL MARKETS · USA

Tradeweb Markets Inc. creates and operates electronic marketplaces in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, Asia Pacific and internationally.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?