WallStSmart

Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG)vsUniversal Health Services Inc (UHS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Universal Health Services Inc generates 23% more annual revenue ($17.76B vs $14.47B). UHS leads profitability with a 8.6% profit margin vs 2.0%. UHS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.17. UHS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 72/100 (B).

FANG

Hold

41

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 5.3Profit: 4.0Value: 4.7Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.24

UHS

Strong Buy

72

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 6.7Profit: 7.0Value: 8.7Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 2.97
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FANGUndervalued (+44.7%)

Margin of Safety

+44.7%

Fair Value

$305.77

Current Price

$188.70

$117.07 discount

UndervaluedFair: $305.77Overvalued
UHSUndervalued (+40.6%)

Margin of Safety

+40.6%

Fair Value

$389.40

Current Price

$169.96

$219.44 discount

UndervaluedFair: $389.40Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FANG2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Price/BookValuation
1.5x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Market CapQuality
$53.58B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

UHS3 strengths · Avg: 9.7/10
P/E RatioValuation
7.1x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.4x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Return on EquityProfitability
21.4%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 21 in profit

Areas to Watch

FANG4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
0.5%3/10

ROE of 0.5% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
2.0%3/10

2.0% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
57.132/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

UHS0 concerns · Avg: 0/10

No major concerns identified

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FANG

The strongest argument for FANG centers on Price/Book, Market Cap.

Bull Case : UHS

The strongest argument for UHS centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Return on Equity. PEG of 1.17 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : FANG

The primary concerns for FANG are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score. A P/E of 196.3x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 2.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : UHS

No major red flags identified for UHS, but monitor valuation.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

UHS carries more volatility with a beta of 1.13 — expect wider price swings.

UHS is growing revenue faster at 9.6% — sustainability is the question.

FANG generates stronger free cash flow (895M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor OIL & GAS E&P industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

UHS scores higher overall (72/100 vs 41/100). FANG offers better value entry with a 44.7% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Diamondback Energy Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.

Universal Health Services Inc

HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL CARE FACILITIES · USA

UnitedHealth Group Incorporated is an American for-profit multinational managed healthcare and insurance company based in Minnetonka, Minnesota. It offers health care products and insurance services.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?