WallStSmart

Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG)vsVOC Energy Trust (VOC)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Diamondback Energy Inc generates 173954% more annual revenue ($14.46B vs $8.31M). VOC leads profitability with a 90.0% profit margin vs 2.0%. VOC trades at a lower P/E of 6.6x. VOC earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 45/100 (D+).

FANG

Hold

41

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 4.7Profit: 4.0Value: 4.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.28

VOC

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 3.3Profit: 10.0Value: 7.0Quality: 4.8
Piotroski: 2/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FANGUndervalued (+41.1%)

Margin of Safety

+41.1%

Fair Value

$286.80

Current Price

$192.62

$94.18 discount

UndervaluedFair: $286.80Overvalued
VOCUndervalued (+1.6%)

Margin of Safety

+1.6%

Fair Value

$3.20

Current Price

$2.86

$0.34 discount

UndervaluedFair: $3.20Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FANG2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Price/BookValuation
1.5x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Market CapQuality
$56.94B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

VOC4 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
6.6x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Return on EquityProfitability
77.0%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 77 in profit

Profit MarginProfitability
90.0%10/10

Keeps 90 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Operating MarginProfitability
96.5%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 96.5%

Areas to Watch

FANG4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.2%4/10

4.2% revenue growth

Return on EquityProfitability
1.1%3/10

ROE of 1.1% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
2.0%3/10

2.0% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

VOC3 concerns · Avg: 2.7/10
Market CapQuality
$49.38M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-16.5%2/10

Revenue declined 16.5%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FANG

The strongest argument for FANG centers on Price/Book, Market Cap.

Bull Case : VOC

The strongest argument for VOC centers on P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 90.0% and operating margin at 96.5%.

Bear Case : FANG

The primary concerns for FANG are Revenue Growth, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. A P/E of 208.7x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 2.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : VOC

The primary concerns for VOC are Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score, Revenue Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FANG profiles as a value stock while VOC is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.

FANG carries more volatility with a beta of 0.44 — expect wider price swings.

FANG is growing revenue faster at 4.2% — sustainability is the question.

Monitor OIL & GAS E&P industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

VOC scores higher overall (45/100 vs 41/100), backed by strong 90.0% margins. FANG offers better value entry with a 41.1% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Diamondback Energy Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.

VOC Energy Trust

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

The VOC Energy Trust acquires and maintains a forward interest in the net proceeds of the net proceeds from the production and sale of interests in oil and natural gas properties in the states of Kansas and Texas. The company is headquartered in Houston, Texas.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?