WallStSmart

Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG)vsVOC Energy Trust (VOC)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Diamondback Energy Inc generates 146009% more annual revenue ($14.29B vs $9.78M). VOC leads profitability with a 87.7% profit margin vs 11.6%. VOC trades at a lower P/E of 7.3x. FANG earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 45/100 (D+).

FANG

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 4.0Value: 4.7Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.24

VOC

Hold

41

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 4.0Profit: 10.0Value: 7.0Quality: 4.8
Piotroski: 2/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FANGSignificantly Overvalued (-29.4%)

Margin of Safety

-29.4%

Fair Value

$130.64

Current Price

$196.02

$65.38 premium

UndervaluedFair: $130.64Overvalued
VOCUndervalued (+7.3%)

Margin of Safety

+7.3%

Fair Value

$3.40

Current Price

$3.58

$0.18 discount

UndervaluedFair: $3.40Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FANG3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$55.59B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
1.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.40B8/10

Generating 1.4B in free cash flow

VOC4 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
7.3x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Return on EquityProfitability
74.2%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 74 in profit

Profit MarginProfitability
87.7%10/10

Keeps 88 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Operating MarginProfitability
86.7%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 86.7%

Areas to Watch

FANG4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
34.4x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Return on EquityProfitability
3.7%3/10

ROE of 3.7% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
103.602/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

VOC4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$62.39M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-36.5%2/10

Revenue declined 36.5%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-38.9%2/10

Earnings declined 38.9%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FANG

The strongest argument for FANG centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : VOC

The strongest argument for VOC centers on P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 87.7% and operating margin at 86.7%.

Bear Case : FANG

The primary concerns for FANG are P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : VOC

The primary concerns for VOC are Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score, Revenue Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FANG carries more volatility with a beta of 0.57 — expect wider price swings.

FANG is growing revenue faster at -9.4% — sustainability is the question.

Monitor OIL & GAS E&P industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

FANG scores higher overall (45/100 vs 41/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Diamondback Energy Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.

VOC Energy Trust

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

The VOC Energy Trust acquires and maintains a forward interest in the net proceeds of the net proceeds from the production and sale of interests in oil and natural gas properties in the states of Kansas and Texas. The company is headquartered in Houston, Texas.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?