Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG)vsW&T Offshore Inc (WTI)
FANG
Diamondback Energy Inc
$196.02
-0.53%
ENERGY · Cap: $55.59B
WTI
W&T Offshore Inc
$3.00
-0.66%
ENERGY · Cap: $449.31M
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Diamondback Energy Inc generates 2751% more annual revenue ($14.29B vs $501.46M). FANG leads profitability with a 11.6% profit margin vs -29.9%. WTI appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.73. FANG earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 45/100 (D+).
FANG
Hold45
out of 100
Grade: D+
WTI
Hold35
out of 100
Grade: F
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
-29.4%
Fair Value
$130.64
Current Price
$196.02
$65.38 premium
Intrinsic value data unavailable for WTI.
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Large-cap with strong market position
Reasonable price relative to book value
Generating 1.4B in free cash flow
Conservative balance sheet, low leverage
Growing faster than its price suggests
Areas to Watch
Premium valuation, high expectations priced in
ROE of 3.7% — below average capital efficiency
Weak financial health signals
Expensive relative to growth rate
1.1% revenue growth
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
Weak financial health signals
ROE of -1.7% — below average capital efficiency
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : FANG
The strongest argument for FANG centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Free Cash Flow.
Bull Case : WTI
The strongest argument for WTI centers on Debt/Equity, PEG Ratio. PEG of 0.73 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bear Case : FANG
The primary concerns for FANG are P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.
Bear Case : WTI
The primary concerns for WTI are Revenue Growth, Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
FANG profiles as a declining stock while WTI is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.
FANG carries more volatility with a beta of 0.57 — expect wider price swings.
WTI is growing revenue faster at 1.1% — sustainability is the question.
FANG generates stronger free cash flow (1.4B), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
FANG scores higher overall (45/100 vs 35/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Diamondback Energy Inc
ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA
Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.
W&T Offshore Inc
ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA
W&T Offshore, Inc., an independent oil and natural gas producer, is engaged in the acquisition, exploration and development of oil and natural gas properties in the Gulf of Mexico. The company is headquartered in Houston, Texas.
Visit Website →Compare with Other OIL & GAS E&P Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?