WallStSmart

Fluor Corporation (FLR)vsOshkosh Corporation (OSK)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Fluor Corporation generates 49% more annual revenue ($15.50B vs $10.42B). OSK leads profitability with a 6.2% profit margin vs -0.3%. FLR appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.34. FLR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 52/100 (C-).

FLR

Buy

52

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 2.5Value: 7.0Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 3.12

OSK

Hold

48

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 3.3Profit: 5.5Value: 6.7Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 2.82
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FLRUndervalued (+45.6%)

Margin of Safety

+45.6%

Fair Value

$87.05

Current Price

$54.20

$32.85 discount

UndervaluedFair: $87.05Overvalued
OSKUndervalued (+32.9%)

Margin of Safety

+32.9%

Fair Value

$260.07

Current Price

$156.71

$103.36 discount

UndervaluedFair: $260.07Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FLR3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
1427.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 1427.0% YoY

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.1210/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Price/BookValuation
2.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

OSK2 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
15.5x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.2x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

FLR4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Operating MarginProfitability
2.0%3/10

Operating margin of 2.0%

Return on EquityProfitability
-1.7%2/10

ROE of -1.7% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-2.0%2/10

Revenue declined 2.0%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-378.00M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

OSK4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
3.5%4/10

3.5% revenue growth

Profit MarginProfitability
6.2%3/10

6.2% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
6.302/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FLR

The strongest argument for FLR centers on EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score, Price/Book. PEG of 1.34 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : OSK

The strongest argument for OSK centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Bear Case : FLR

The primary concerns for FLR are Operating Margin, Return on Equity, Revenue Growth.

Bear Case : OSK

The primary concerns for OSK are Revenue Growth, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FLR profiles as a turnaround stock while OSK is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

OSK carries more volatility with a beta of 1.39 — expect wider price swings.

OSK is growing revenue faster at 3.5% — sustainability is the question.

OSK generates stronger free cash flow (526M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

FLR scores higher overall (52/100 vs 48/100). OSK offers better value entry with a 32.9% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Fluor Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION · USA

Fluor Corporation provides engineering, procurement, construction, manufacturing and modularization, operation, maintenance and asset integrity and project management services globally. The company is headquartered in Irving, Texas.

Visit Website →

Oshkosh Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · FARM & HEAVY CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY · USA

Oshkosh Corporation designs, manufactures and markets specialty vehicles and bodies worldwide. The company is headquartered in Oshkosh, Wisconsin.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?