WallStSmart

Floor & Decor Holdings Inc (FND)vsLululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Lululemon Athletica Inc. generates 137% more annual revenue ($11.10B vs $4.68B). LULU leads profitability with a 14.2% profit margin vs 4.3%. LULU appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.64. LULU earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 65/100 (B-).

FND

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 2.7Profit: 4.5Value: 6.7Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.82

LULU

Strong Buy

65

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 8.5Value: 9.3Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 4.32
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FNDUndervalued (+31.2%)

Margin of Safety

+31.2%

Fair Value

$100.24

Current Price

$50.57

$49.67 discount

UndervaluedFair: $100.24Overvalued
LULUUndervalued (+71.2%)

Margin of Safety

+71.2%

Fair Value

$609.94

Current Price

$128.98

$480.96 discount

UndervaluedFair: $609.94Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FND1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
2.2x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

LULU5 strengths · Avg: 9.2/10
P/E RatioValuation
10.1x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Return on EquityProfitability
34.0%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 34 in profit

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.3210/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

PEG RatioValuation
0.648/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Operating MarginProfitability
22.3%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 22.3%

Areas to Watch

FND4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.204/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
27.5x4/10

Moderate valuation

Profit MarginProfitability
4.3%3/10

4.3% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
4.5%3/10

Operating margin of 4.5%

LULU3 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
0.8%4/10

0.8% revenue growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-18.5%2/10

Earnings declined 18.5%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FND

The strongest argument for FND centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : LULU

The strongest argument for LULU centers on P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Altman Z-Score. PEG of 0.64 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : FND

The primary concerns for FND are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Profit Margin. Thin 4.3% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : LULU

The primary concerns for LULU are Revenue Growth, Piotroski F-Score, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FND carries more volatility with a beta of 1.82 — expect wider price swings.

LULU is growing revenue faster at 0.8% — sustainability is the question.

LULU generates stronger free cash flow (960M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor HOME IMPROVEMENT RETAIL industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

LULU scores higher overall (65/100 vs 40/100). FND offers better value entry with a 31.2% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Floor & Decor Holdings Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · HOME IMPROVEMENT RETAIL · USA

Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. is a multi-channel specialty retailer of hard surface flooring and related accessories. The company is headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia.

Visit Website →

Lululemon Athletica Inc.

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · APPAREL RETAIL · USA

lululemon athletica inc. The company is headquartered in Vancouver, Canada.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?