WallStSmart

Floor & Decor Holdings Inc (FND)vsLululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU)

VS
⚡

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Lululemon Athletica Inc. generates 135% more annual revenue ($11.09B vs $4.71B). LULU leads profitability with a 12.8% profit margin vs 4.9%. LULU appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.13. LULU earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 60/100 (C).

FND

Buy

53

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 6.0Profit: 5.0Value: 5.3Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.05

LULU

Buy

60

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.0Profit: 7.5Value: 8.7Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 4.12
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FNDUndervalued (+13.8%)

Margin of Safety

+13.8%

Fair Value

$79.98

Current Price

$47.55

$32.43 discount

UndervaluedFair: $79.98Overvalued
LULUUndervalued (+70.2%)

Margin of Safety

+70.2%

Fair Value

$589.81

Current Price

$105.22

$484.59 discount

UndervaluedFair: $589.81Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FND2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
53.4%10/10

Earnings expanding 53.4% YoY

Price/BookValuation
2.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

LULU4 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
8.0x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.1210/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Return on EquityProfitability
29.6%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 30 in profit

Price/BookValuation
2.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

FND3 concerns · Avg: 3.7/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.204/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
3.0%4/10

3.0% revenue growth

Profit MarginProfitability
4.9%3/10

4.9% margin — thin

LULU3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-4.3%2/10

Revenue declined 4.3%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-5.9%2/10

Earnings declined 5.9%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FND

The strongest argument for FND centers on EPS Growth, Price/Book.

Bull Case : LULU

The strongest argument for LULU centers on P/E Ratio, Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity. PEG of 1.13 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : FND

The primary concerns for FND are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, Profit Margin. Thin 4.9% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : LULU

The primary concerns for LULU are Piotroski F-Score, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FND profiles as a value stock while LULU is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.

FND carries more volatility with a beta of 1.60 — expect wider price swings.

FND is growing revenue faster at 3.0% — sustainability is the question.

LULU generates stronger free cash flow (225M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

LULU scores higher overall (60/100 vs 53/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Floor & Decor Holdings Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · HOME IMPROVEMENT RETAIL · USA

Floor & Decor Holdings, Inc. is a multi-channel specialty retailer of hard surface flooring and related accessories. The company is headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia.

Visit Website →

Lululemon Athletica Inc.

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · APPAREL RETAIL · USA

lululemon athletica inc. The company is headquartered in Vancouver, Canada.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?