WallStSmart

Lowe's Companies Inc (LOW)vsLululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Lowe's Companies Inc generates 677% more annual revenue ($86.29B vs $11.10B). LULU leads profitability with a 14.2% profit margin vs 7.7%. LULU appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.64. LULU earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 65/100 (B-).

LOW

Hold

44

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 3.3Profit: 5.5Value: 4.0Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.16

LULU

Strong Buy

65

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 8.5Value: 9.3Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 4.32
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

LOWSignificantly Overvalued (-34.2%)

Margin of Safety

-34.2%

Fair Value

$167.88

Current Price

$223.72

$55.84 premium

UndervaluedFair: $167.88Overvalued
LULUUndervalued (+71.2%)

Margin of Safety

+71.2%

Fair Value

$609.94

Current Price

$128.98

$480.96 discount

UndervaluedFair: $609.94Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

LOW2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Debt/EquityHealth
-4.3110/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Market CapQuality
$130.68B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

LULU5 strengths · Avg: 9.2/10
P/E RatioValuation
10.1x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Return on EquityProfitability
34.0%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 34 in profit

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.3210/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

PEG RatioValuation
0.648/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Operating MarginProfitability
22.3%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 22.3%

Areas to Watch

LOW4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.484/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
0.0%3/10

ROE of 0.0% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
7.7%3/10

7.7% margin — thin

EPS GrowthGrowth
-11.0%2/10

Earnings declined 11.0%

LULU3 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
0.8%4/10

0.8% revenue growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-18.5%2/10

Earnings declined 18.5%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : LOW

The strongest argument for LOW centers on Debt/Equity, Market Cap. Revenue growth of 10.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : LULU

The strongest argument for LULU centers on P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Altman Z-Score. PEG of 0.64 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : LOW

The primary concerns for LOW are PEG Ratio, Return on Equity, Profit Margin.

Bear Case : LULU

The primary concerns for LULU are Revenue Growth, Piotroski F-Score, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

LULU carries more volatility with a beta of 1.07 — expect wider price swings.

LOW is growing revenue faster at 10.9% — sustainability is the question.

LOW generates stronger free cash flow (964M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor HOME IMPROVEMENT RETAIL industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

LULU scores higher overall (65/100 vs 44/100). Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Lowe's Companies Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · HOME IMPROVEMENT RETAIL · USA

Lowe's Companies, Inc. is an American retail company specializing in home improvement. Headquartered in Mooresville, North Carolina, the company operates a chain of retail stores in the United States and Canada.

Visit Website →

Lululemon Athletica Inc.

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · APPAREL RETAIL · USA

lululemon athletica inc. The company is headquartered in Vancouver, Canada.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?