WallStSmart

Live Ventures Inc (LIVE)vsLululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Lululemon Athletica Inc. generates 2459% more annual revenue ($11.20B vs $437.87M). LULU leads profitability with a 13.0% profit margin vs 0.9%. LULU earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).

LIVE

Avoid

33

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.0Profit: 4.0Value: 6.7Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.02

LULU

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 8.0Value: 9.3Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 4.12
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

LIVEUndervalued (+86.4%)

Margin of Safety

+86.4%

Fair Value

$143.82

Current Price

$9.06

$134.76 discount

UndervaluedFair: $143.82Overvalued
LULUUndervalued (+70.7%)

Margin of Safety

+70.7%

Fair Value

$600.18

Current Price

$114.23

$485.95 discount

UndervaluedFair: $600.18Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

LIVE1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.3x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

LULU5 strengths · Avg: 9.2/10
P/E RatioValuation
9.6x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Return on EquityProfitability
30.3%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 30 in profit

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.1210/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

PEG RatioValuation
0.588/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
2.7x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

LIVE4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Market CapQuality
$28.66M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
4.2%3/10

ROE of 4.2% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
0.9%3/10

0.9% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
1.9%3/10

Operating margin of 1.9%

LULU3 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.3%4/10

4.3% revenue growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-35.0%2/10

Earnings declined 35.0%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : LIVE

The strongest argument for LIVE centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : LULU

The strongest argument for LULU centers on P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Altman Z-Score. PEG of 0.58 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : LIVE

The primary concerns for LIVE are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. Debt-to-equity of 2.50 is elevated, increasing financial risk. Thin 0.9% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : LULU

The primary concerns for LULU are Revenue Growth, Piotroski F-Score, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

LIVE carries more volatility with a beta of 0.99 — expect wider price swings.

LULU is growing revenue faster at 4.3% — sustainability is the question.

LULU generates stronger free cash flow (87M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor HOME IMPROVEMENT RETAIL industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

LULU scores higher overall (64/100 vs 33/100). LIVE offers better value entry with a 86.4% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Live Ventures Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · HOME IMPROVEMENT RETAIL · USA

Live Ventures Incorporated is engaged in flooring manufacturing, steel fabrication and retail businesses in the United States. The company is headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada.

Visit Website →

Lululemon Athletica Inc.

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · APPAREL RETAIL · USA

lululemon athletica inc. The company is headquartered in Vancouver, Canada.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?