WallStSmart

Grocery Outlet Holding Corp (GO)vsTarget Corporation (TGT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Target Corporation generates 2149% more annual revenue ($106.38B vs $4.73B). TGT leads profitability with a 3.2% profit margin vs -8.1%. TGT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 52/100 (C-).

GO

Hold

36

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.0Profit: 2.5Value: 6.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.69

TGT

Buy

52

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 3.3Profit: 5.5Value: 5.3Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.47
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

GOUndervalued (+60.0%)

Margin of Safety

+60.0%

Fair Value

$24.46

Current Price

$9.47

$14.99 discount

UndervaluedFair: $24.46Overvalued
TGTUndervalued (+4.0%)

Margin of Safety

+4.0%

Fair Value

$119.41

Current Price

$122.57

$3.16 discount

UndervaluedFair: $119.41Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

GO1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.2x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

TGT3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Market CapQuality
$60.48B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
21.0%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 21 in profit

P/E RatioValuation
17.6x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Areas to Watch

GO4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
3.6%4/10

3.6% revenue growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.694/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Market CapQuality
$947.68M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
-47.3%2/10

ROE of -47.3% — below average capital efficiency

TGT4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Profit MarginProfitability
3.2%3/10

3.2% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
4.5%3/10

Operating margin of 4.5%

Debt/EquityHealth
1.153/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : GO

The strongest argument for GO centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : TGT

The strongest argument for TGT centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, P/E Ratio.

Bear Case : GO

The primary concerns for GO are Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score, Market Cap. Debt-to-equity of 2.28 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : TGT

The primary concerns for TGT are Profit Margin, Operating Margin, Debt/Equity. Thin 3.2% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

GO profiles as a turnaround stock while TGT is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

TGT carries more volatility with a beta of 0.99 — expect wider price swings.

TGT is growing revenue faster at 6.7% — sustainability is the question.

GO generates stronger free cash flow (-193,000), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

TGT scores higher overall (52/100 vs 36/100). GO offers better value entry with a 60.0% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Grocery Outlet Holding Corp

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · GROCERY STORES · USA

Grocery Outlet Holding Corp. The company is headquartered in Emeryville, California.

Visit Website →

Target Corporation

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · DISCOUNT STORES · USA

Target Corporation is an American retail corporation. Their retail formats include the discount store Target, the hypermarket SuperTarget, and small-format stores previously named CityTarget and TargetExpress before being consolidated under the Target branding.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?