Goldman Sachs Group Inc (GS)vsPerella Weinberg Partners (PWP)
GS
Goldman Sachs Group Inc
$841.84
+0.73%
FINANCIAL SERVICES · Cap: $250.66B
PWP
Perella Weinberg Partners
$17.43
+1.10%
FINANCIAL SERVICES · Cap: $1.60B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Goldman Sachs Group Inc generates 7810% more annual revenue ($59.40B vs $750.90M). GS leads profitability with a 28.9% profit margin vs 4.7%. GS trades at a lower P/E of 16.3x. GS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 73/100 (B).
GS
Strong Buy73
out of 100
Grade: B
PWP
Avoid32
out of 100
Grade: F
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+52.4%
Fair Value
$1768.48
Current Price
$841.84
$926.64 discount
Margin of Safety
-640.9%
Fair Value
$3.20
Current Price
$17.43
$14.23 premium
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Mega-cap, among the largest globally
Strong operational efficiency at 38.3%
Keeps 29 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Reasonable price relative to book value
15.2% revenue growth
No standout strengths identified
Areas to Watch
Negative free cash flow — burning cash
Premium valuation, high expectations priced in
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
4.7% margin — thin
Weak financial health signals
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : GS
The strongest argument for GS centers on Market Cap, Operating Margin, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 28.9% and operating margin at 38.3%. Revenue growth of 15.2% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bull Case : PWP
PWP has a balanced fundamental profile.
Bear Case : GS
The primary concerns for GS are Free Cash Flow.
Bear Case : PWP
The primary concerns for PWP are P/E Ratio, Market Cap, Profit Margin. Thin 4.7% margins leave little buffer for downturns.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
GS profiles as a growth stock while PWP is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.
PWP carries more volatility with a beta of 1.69 — expect wider price swings.
GS is growing revenue faster at 15.2% — sustainability is the question.
PWP generates stronger free cash flow (95M), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
GS scores higher overall (73/100 vs 32/100), backed by strong 28.9% margins and 15.2% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Goldman Sachs Group Inc
FINANCIAL SERVICES · CAPITAL MARKETS · USA
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., is an American multinational investment bank and financial services company headquartered in New York City. It offers services in investment management, securities, asset management, prime brokerage, and securities underwriting. It also provides investment banking to institutional investors.
Perella Weinberg Partners
FINANCIAL SERVICES · CAPITAL MARKETS · USA
Perella Weinberg Partners (PWP) is a leading independent advisory and asset management firm noted for its deep expertise in mergers and acquisitions, restructuring, and capital raising across a variety of sectors. Leveraging its extensive global reach and strong client relationships, PWP delivers customized solutions that drive value and enhance outcomes for its clients. Committed to a client-first philosophy, the firm has established itself as a trusted partner in the financial landscape, making it an attractive investment opportunity for those seeking exposure to a well-respected player poised for growth in favorable market conditions.
Visit Website →Compare with Other CAPITAL MARKETS Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?