WallStSmart

H2O America (HTO)vsUnilever PLC ADR (UL)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Unilever PLC ADR generates 6087% more annual revenue ($50.50B vs $816.28M). UL leads profitability with a 18.8% profit margin vs 12.9%. HTO appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.51. HTO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 57/100 (C).

HTO

Buy

57

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 5.3Profit: 5.5Value: 6.0Quality: 5.0

UL

Hold

46

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.0Profit: 8.5Value: 4.3Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

HTOUndervalued (+32.5%)

Margin of Safety

+32.5%

Fair Value

$76.99

Current Price

$57.60

$19.39 discount

UndervaluedFair: $76.99Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for UL.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

HTO2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.4x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
21.5%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 21.5%

UL4 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
31.0%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 31 in profit

Market CapQuality
$128.81B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Operating MarginProfitability
20.1%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 20.1%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$5.48B8/10

Generating 5.5B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

HTO4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Return on EquityProfitability
6.5%3/10

ROE of 6.5% — below average capital efficiency

PEG RatioValuation
2.512/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-49.23M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

UL3 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
11.152/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-3.2%2/10

Revenue declined 3.2%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-3.4%2/10

Earnings declined 3.4%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : HTO

The strongest argument for HTO centers on Price/Book, Operating Margin.

Bull Case : UL

The strongest argument for UL centers on Return on Equity, Market Cap, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 18.8% and operating margin at 20.1%.

Bear Case : HTO

The primary concerns for HTO are EPS Growth, Return on Equity, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : UL

The primary concerns for UL are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

HTO profiles as a value stock while UL is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.

UL carries more volatility with a beta of 0.46 — expect wider price swings.

HTO is growing revenue faster at 9.4% — sustainability is the question.

UL generates stronger free cash flow (5.5B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

HTO scores higher overall (57/100 vs 46/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

H2O America

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED WATER · USA

H2O America, provides water utility and other related services in the United States. The company is headquartered in San Jose, California.

Unilever PLC ADR

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS · USA

Unilever PLC is a fast moving consumer goods company in Asia, Africa, the Middle East, Turkey, Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, America and Europe. The company is headquartered in London, the United Kingdom.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?