WallStSmart

Inter Parfums Inc (IPAR)vsTarget Corporation (TGT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Target Corporation generates 7018% more annual revenue ($106.38B vs $1.49B). IPAR leads profitability with a 11.3% profit margin vs 3.2%. TGT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.30. TGT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 52/100 (C-).

IPAR

Buy

51

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 7.5Value: 4.0Quality: 7.3
Piotroski: 2/9

TGT

Buy

52

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 3.3Profit: 5.5Value: 6.0Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.47
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

IPARSignificantly Overvalued (-35.4%)

Margin of Safety

-35.4%

Fair Value

$74.32

Current Price

$91.27

$16.95 premium

UndervaluedFair: $74.32Overvalued
TGTUndervalued (+4.0%)

Margin of Safety

+4.0%

Fair Value

$119.45

Current Price

$122.57

$3.12 discount

UndervaluedFair: $119.45Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

IPAR3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Debt/EquityHealth
0.219/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

P/E RatioValuation
17.9x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Operating MarginProfitability
21.5%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 21.5%

TGT4 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Market CapQuality
$55.95B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
21.0%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 21 in profit

Debt/EquityHealth
0.289/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

P/E RatioValuation
16.3x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Areas to Watch

IPAR4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
1.8%4/10

1.8% revenue growth

EPS GrowthGrowth
2.3%4/10

2.3% earnings growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
3.202/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

TGT4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.304/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Profit MarginProfitability
3.2%3/10

3.2% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
4.5%3/10

Operating margin of 4.5%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : IPAR

The strongest argument for IPAR centers on Debt/Equity, P/E Ratio, Operating Margin.

Bull Case : TGT

The strongest argument for TGT centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, Debt/Equity.

Bear Case : IPAR

The primary concerns for IPAR are Revenue Growth, EPS Growth, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : TGT

The primary concerns for TGT are PEG Ratio, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Thin 3.2% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

IPAR carries more volatility with a beta of 1.18 — expect wider price swings.

TGT is growing revenue faster at 6.7% — sustainability is the question.

IPAR generates stronger free cash flow (-1M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

TGT scores higher overall (52/100 vs 51/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Inter Parfums Inc

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS · USA

Inter Parfums, Inc., manufactures, markets and distributes a range of fragrances and fragrance-related products in the United States and internationally. The company is headquartered in New York, New York.

Visit Website →

Target Corporation

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · DISCOUNT STORES · USA

Target Corporation is an American retail corporation. Their retail formats include the discount store Target, the hypermarket SuperTarget, and small-format stores previously named CityTarget and TargetExpress before being consolidated under the Target branding.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?