WallStSmart

Inter Parfums Inc (IPAR)vsTarget Corporation (TGT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Target Corporation generates 7072% more annual revenue ($107.70B vs $1.50B). IPAR leads profitability with a 11.2% profit margin vs 4.1%. TGT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.94. TGT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 66/100 (B-).

IPAR

Hold

46

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 7.0Value: 3.3Quality: 8.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 4.14

TGT

Strong Buy

66

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 6.0Profit: 6.0Value: 6.0Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.47
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

IPARSignificantly Overvalued (-33.3%)

Margin of Safety

-33.3%

Fair Value

$75.50

Current Price

$112.01

$36.51 premium

UndervaluedFair: $75.50Overvalued
TGTUndervalued (+5.3%)

Margin of Safety

+5.3%

Fair Value

$120.98

Current Price

$155.83

$34.85 discount

UndervaluedFair: $120.98Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

IPAR2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.1410/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Debt/EquityHealth
0.199/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

TGT5 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
100.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 100.5% YoY

Market CapQuality
$70.79B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
24.6%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 25 in profit

P/E RatioValuation
16.2x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Free Cash FlowQuality
$2.43B8/10

Generating 2.4B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

IPAR4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
2.1%4/10

2.1% revenue growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
3.202/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-4.0%2/10

Earnings declined 4.0%

TGT4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.944/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Profit MarginProfitability
4.1%3/10

4.1% margin — thin

Debt/EquityHealth
1.053/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : IPAR

The strongest argument for IPAR centers on Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity.

Bull Case : TGT

The strongest argument for TGT centers on EPS Growth, Market Cap, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : IPAR

The primary concerns for IPAR are Revenue Growth, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : TGT

The primary concerns for TGT are PEG Ratio, Profit Margin, Debt/Equity. Thin 4.1% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

IPAR carries more volatility with a beta of 1.13 — expect wider price swings.

TGT is growing revenue faster at 5.3% — sustainability is the question.

TGT generates stronger free cash flow (2.4B), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

TGT scores higher overall (66/100 vs 46/100). Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Inter Parfums Inc

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS · USA

Inter Parfums, Inc., manufactures, markets and distributes a range of fragrances and fragrance-related products in the United States and internationally. The company is headquartered in New York, New York.

Visit Website →

Target Corporation

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · DISCOUNT STORES · USA

Target Corporation is an American retail corporation. Their retail formats include the discount store Target, the hypermarket SuperTarget, and small-format stores previously named CityTarget and TargetExpress before being consolidated under the Target branding.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?