WallStSmart

Kenon Holdings (KEN)vsTXNM Energy, Inc. (TXNM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

TXNM Energy, Inc. generates 151% more annual revenue ($2.19B vs $871.93M). KEN leads profitability with a 7.6% profit margin vs 6.7%. TXNM trades at a lower P/E of 42.0x. TXNM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 49/100 (D+).

KEN

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 6.7Profit: 4.5Value: 3.0Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.23

TXNM

Hold

49

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.7Profit: 5.0Value: 3.3Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 0.48
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

KENSignificantly Overvalued (-39.5%)

Margin of Safety

-39.5%

Fair Value

$54.68

Current Price

$88.89

$34.21 premium

UndervaluedFair: $54.68Overvalued
TXNMOvervalued (-10.8%)

Margin of Safety

-10.8%

Fair Value

$53.56

Current Price

$58.99

$5.43 premium

UndervaluedFair: $53.56Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

KEN2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
43.1%10/10

Revenue surging 43.1% year-over-year

Price/BookValuation
2.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

TXNM1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

KEN4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
5.1%3/10

ROE of 5.1% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
7.6%3/10

7.6% margin — thin

P/E RatioValuation
68.0x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
-93.7%2/10

Earnings declined 93.7%

TXNM4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.6%4/10

4.6% revenue growth

Return on EquityProfitability
5.4%3/10

ROE of 5.4% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
6.7%3/10

6.7% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : KEN

The strongest argument for KEN centers on Revenue Growth, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 43.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : TXNM

The strongest argument for TXNM centers on Price/Book.

Bear Case : KEN

The primary concerns for KEN are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 68.0x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : TXNM

The primary concerns for TXNM are Revenue Growth, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. A P/E of 42.0x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

KEN profiles as a hypergrowth stock while TXNM is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

KEN carries more volatility with a beta of 0.38 — expect wider price swings.

KEN is growing revenue faster at 43.1% — sustainability is the question.

KEN generates stronger free cash flow (53M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

TXNM scores higher overall (49/100 vs 40/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Kenon Holdings

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

Kenon Holdings Ltd., is the owner, developer and operator of power generation facilities in Israel and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Visit Website →

TXNM Energy, Inc.

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED ELECTRIC · USA

TXNM Energy, Inc., provides electricity and electric services in the United States. The company is headquartered in Albuquerque, New Mexico.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?