WallStSmart

Life Time Group Holdings Inc (LTH)vsMattel Inc (MAT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Mattel Inc generates 79% more annual revenue ($5.35B vs $3.00B). LTH leads profitability with a 12.5% profit margin vs 7.4%. MAT trades at a lower P/E of 12.0x. LTH earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 66/100 (B-).

LTH

Strong Buy

66

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 6.0Profit: 6.5Value: 8.3Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 0.89

MAT

Buy

58

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 3.3Profit: 6.0Value: 7.3Quality: 5.8
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.54
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

LTHUndervalued (+61.8%)

Margin of Safety

+61.8%

Fair Value

$77.69

Current Price

$26.42

$51.27 discount

UndervaluedFair: $77.69Overvalued
MATSignificantly Overvalued (-87.4%)

Margin of Safety

-87.4%

Fair Value

$8.43

Current Price

$14.87

$6.44 premium

UndervaluedFair: $8.43Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

LTH2 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
15.6x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

MAT2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
12.0x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

LTH4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
2.2%4/10

2.2% earnings growth

Debt/EquityHealth
1.383/10

Elevated debt levels

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-64.64M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.892/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

MAT3 concerns · Avg: 2.7/10
Profit MarginProfitability
7.4%3/10

7.4% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-18.5%2/10

Earnings declined 18.5%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : LTH

The strongest argument for LTH centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 12.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : MAT

The strongest argument for MAT centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 1.44 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : LTH

The primary concerns for LTH are EPS Growth, Debt/Equity, Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : MAT

The primary concerns for MAT are Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

LTH carries more volatility with a beta of 1.69 — expect wider price swings.

LTH is growing revenue faster at 12.3% — sustainability is the question.

MAT generates stronger free cash flow (739M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor LEISURE industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

LTH scores higher overall (66/100 vs 58/100) and 12.3% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Life Time Group Holdings Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · LEISURE · USA

Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. offers health, fitness and wellness experiences to a community of individual members in the United States and Canada. The company is headquartered in Chanhassen, Minnesota.

Mattel Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · LEISURE · USA

Mattel, Inc., a children's entertainment company, designs and produces toys and consumer products worldwide. The company is headquartered in El Segundo, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?