WallStSmart

Mattel Inc (MAT)vsPlanet Fitness Inc (PLNT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Mattel Inc generates 332% more annual revenue ($5.35B vs $1.24B). PLNT leads profitability with a 17.7% profit margin vs 7.4%. PLNT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.23. PLNT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 63/100 (C+).

MAT

Buy

58

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 3.3Profit: 6.0Value: 7.3Quality: 5.8
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.54

PLNT

Buy

63

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 8.0Profit: 7.0Value: 9.3Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 0.62
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

MATSignificantly Overvalued (-87.4%)

Margin of Safety

-87.4%

Fair Value

$8.43

Current Price

$14.87

$6.44 premium

UndervaluedFair: $8.43Overvalued
PLNTUndervalued (+24.9%)

Margin of Safety

+24.9%

Fair Value

$122.62

Current Price

$75.16

$47.46 discount

UndervaluedFair: $122.62Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

MAT2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
12.0x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

PLNT3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Operating MarginProfitability
30.0%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 30.0%

Debt/EquityHealth
-13.2210/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

EPS GrowthGrowth
32.5%8/10

Earnings expanding 32.5% YoY

Areas to Watch

MAT3 concerns · Avg: 2.7/10
Profit MarginProfitability
7.4%3/10

7.4% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-18.5%2/10

Earnings declined 18.5%

PLNT3 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
28.7x4/10

Moderate valuation

Return on EquityProfitability
0.0%3/10

ROE of 0.0% — below average capital efficiency

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.622/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : MAT

The strongest argument for MAT centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 1.44 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : PLNT

The strongest argument for PLNT centers on Operating Margin, Debt/Equity, EPS Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 17.7% and operating margin at 30.0%. Revenue growth of 10.7% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : MAT

The primary concerns for MAT are Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : PLNT

The primary concerns for PLNT are P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Altman Z-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

MAT profiles as a value stock while PLNT is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

PLNT carries more volatility with a beta of 1.30 — expect wider price swings.

PLNT is growing revenue faster at 10.7% — sustainability is the question.

MAT generates stronger free cash flow (739M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

PLNT scores higher overall (63/100 vs 58/100), backed by strong 17.7% margins and 10.7% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Mattel Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · LEISURE · USA

Mattel, Inc., a children's entertainment company, designs and produces toys and consumer products worldwide. The company is headquartered in El Segundo, California.

Planet Fitness Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · LEISURE · USA

Planet Fitness, Inc., franchises and operates gyms under the Planet Fitness brand. The company is headquartered in Hampton, New Hampshire.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?