WallStSmart

Marsh & McLennan Companies Inc (MMC)vsLendingtree Inc (TREE)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Marsh & McLennan Companies Inc generates 1986% more annual revenue ($26.45B vs $1.27B). TREE leads profitability with a 14.3% profit margin vs 0.2%. MMC appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 2.00. TREE earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).

MMC

Buy

62

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 4.0Value: 5.0Quality: 4.8
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.67

TREE

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 7.0Value: 5.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 0.88

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

MMC2 strengths · Avg: 8.5/10
Market CapQuality
$89.82B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Free Cash FlowQuality
$2.30B8/10

Generating 2.3B in free cash flow

TREE4 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
P/E RatioValuation
2.2x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.2x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Return on EquityProfitability
56.6%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 57 in profit

Revenue GrowthGrowth
25.3%8/10

Revenue surging 25.3% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

MMC4 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.004/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
0.1%4/10

0.1% revenue growth

EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.674/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

TREE4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
4.6%4/10

4.6% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$393.25M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Debt/EquityHealth
1.353/10

Elevated debt levels

PEG RatioValuation
3.552/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : MMC

The strongest argument for MMC centers on Market Cap, Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : TREE

The strongest argument for TREE centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Return on Equity. Revenue growth of 25.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : MMC

The primary concerns for MMC are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Thin 0.2% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : TREE

The primary concerns for TREE are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Debt/Equity.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

MMC profiles as a value stock while TREE is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

TREE carries more volatility with a beta of 2.08 — expect wider price swings.

TREE is growing revenue faster at 25.3% — sustainability is the question.

MMC generates stronger free cash flow (2.3B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

TREE scores higher overall (64/100 vs 62/100) and 25.3% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Marsh & McLennan Companies Inc

FINANCIAL SERVICES · INSURANCE BROKERS · USA

Marsh McLennan (formerly known as Marsh & McLennan Companies) is a global professional services firm, headquartered in New York City with businesses in insurance brokerage, risk management, reinsurance services, talent management, investment advisory, and management consulting. Its four main operating companies are Marsh, Guy Carpenter, Mercer, and Oliver Wyman.

Lendingtree Inc

FINANCIAL SERVICES · INSURANCE BROKERS · USA

LendingTree, Inc., through its subsidiary, LT Intermediate Company, LLC, operates an online consumer platform in the United States. The company is headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?