WallStSmart

Murphy Oil Corporation (MUR)vsWoodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Woodside Energy Group Ltd generates 383% more annual revenue ($12.98B vs $2.69B). WDS leads profitability with a 20.9% profit margin vs 3.9%. MUR appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.33. WDS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 53/100 (C-).

MUR

Hold

43

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 2.0Profit: 3.5Value: 4.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 4/9

WDS

Buy

53

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 2.0Profit: 6.0Value: 7.3Quality: 4.8
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.37
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

MURSignificantly Overvalued (-598.8%)

Margin of Safety

-598.8%

Fair Value

$4.90

Current Price

$39.97

$35.07 premium

UndervaluedFair: $4.90Overvalued
WDSSignificantly Overvalued (-94.1%)

Margin of Safety

-94.1%

Fair Value

$9.66

Current Price

$23.66

$14.00 premium

UndervaluedFair: $9.66Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

MUR2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.3310/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
1.1x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

WDS3 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.3x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Profit MarginProfitability
20.9%9/10

Keeps 21 of every $100 in revenue as profit

P/E RatioValuation
17.1x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Areas to Watch

MUR4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
2.6%3/10

ROE of 2.6% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
3.9%3/10

3.9% margin — thin

P/E RatioValuation
53.6x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-8.4%2/10

Revenue declined 8.4%

WDS4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
7.2%3/10

ROE of 7.2% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-11.1%2/10

Revenue declined 11.1%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-14.4%2/10

Earnings declined 14.4%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : MUR

The strongest argument for MUR centers on PEG Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 0.33 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : WDS

The strongest argument for WDS centers on Price/Book, Profit Margin, P/E Ratio. Profitability is solid with margins at 20.9% and operating margin at 19.1%. PEG of 1.33 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : MUR

The primary concerns for MUR are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 53.6x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 3.9% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : WDS

The primary concerns for WDS are Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score, Revenue Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

MUR profiles as a value stock while WDS is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.

MUR carries more volatility with a beta of 0.73 — expect wider price swings.

MUR is growing revenue faster at -8.4% — sustainability is the question.

WDS generates stronger free cash flow (417M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

WDS scores higher overall (53/100 vs 43/100), backed by strong 20.9% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Murphy Oil Corporation

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Murphy Oil Corporation is an oil and natural gas exploration and production company in the United States, Canada, and internationally. The company is headquartered in Houston, Texas.

Woodside Energy Group Ltd

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Woodside Energy Group Ltd is engaged in the exploration, evaluation, development, production, marketing and sale of hydrocarbons in Oceania, Asia, Canada, Africa and internationally. The company is headquartered in Perth, Australia.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?