WallStSmart

Nu Holdings Ltd (NU)vsWells Fargo & Company (WFC)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Wells Fargo & Company generates 968% more annual revenue ($81.14B vs $7.59B). NU leads profitability with a 41.9% profit margin vs 26.7%. NU appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.70. NU earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 84/100 (A-).

NU

Exceptional Buy

84

out of 100

Grade: A-

Growth: 10.0Profit: 9.0Value: 6.3Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 0.22

WFC

Strong Buy

74

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 7.3Profit: 7.5Value: 7.0Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: -0.38

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

NU6 strengths · Avg: 9.7/10
Profit MarginProfitability
41.9%10/10

Keeps 42 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Operating MarginProfitability
48.2%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 48.2%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
43.7%10/10

Revenue surging 43.7% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
55.9%10/10

Earnings expanding 55.9% YoY

Market CapQuality
$57.85B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
25.3%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 25 in profit

WFC6 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Market CapQuality
$236.15B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

P/E RatioValuation
11.9x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Profit MarginProfitability
26.7%9/10

Keeps 27 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Price/BookValuation
1.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
29.4%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 29.4%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$9.14B8/10

Generating 9.1B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

NU3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-1.29B2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.222/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

WFC2 concerns · Avg: 1.5/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
-0.382/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Debt/EquityHealth
2.531/10

Elevated debt levels

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : NU

The strongest argument for NU centers on Profit Margin, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 41.9% and operating margin at 48.2%. Revenue growth of 43.7% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : WFC

The strongest argument for WFC centers on Market Cap, P/E Ratio, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 26.7% and operating margin at 29.4%. PEG of 1.37 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : NU

The primary concerns for NU are Piotroski F-Score, Free Cash Flow, Altman Z-Score.

Bear Case : WFC

The primary concerns for WFC are Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity. Debt-to-equity of 2.53 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

NU profiles as a growth stock while WFC is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

WFC carries more volatility with a beta of 0.96 — expect wider price swings.

NU is growing revenue faster at 43.7% — sustainability is the question.

WFC generates stronger free cash flow (9.1B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

NU scores higher overall (84/100 vs 74/100), backed by strong 41.9% margins and 43.7% revenue growth. Both earn "Exceptional Buy" and "Strong Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Nu Holdings Ltd

FINANCIAL SERVICES · BANKS - REGIONAL · USA

Nu Holdings Ltd. operates in the technology industry. The company is headquartered in Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands.

Visit Website →

Wells Fargo & Company

FINANCIAL SERVICES · BANKS - DIVERSIFIED · USA

Wells Fargo & Company is an American multinational financial services company with corporate headquarters in San Francisco, California, operational headquarters in Manhattan, and managerial offices throughout the United States and overseas.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?