PEDEVCO Corp (PED)vsWoodside Energy Group Ltd (WDS)
PED
PEDEVCO Corp
$14.59
-9.77%
ENERGY · Cap: $49.12M
WDS
Woodside Energy Group Ltd
$23.66
-2.79%
ENERGY · Cap: $46.27B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Woodside Energy Group Ltd generates 38956% more annual revenue ($12.98B vs $33.24M). PED leads profitability with a 28.7% profit margin vs 20.9%. PED trades at a lower P/E of 4.7x. WDS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 53/100 (C-).
PED
Avoid29
out of 100
Grade: F
WDS
Buy53
out of 100
Grade: C-
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+18.1%
Fair Value
$0.75
Current Price
$14.59
$13.84 discount
Margin of Safety
-94.1%
Fair Value
$9.66
Current Price
$23.66
$14.00 premium
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Keeps 29 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Reasonable price relative to book value
Keeps 21 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Areas to Watch
Trading at 11.7x book value
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
Revenue declined 23.1%
Earnings declined 82.3%
ROE of 7.2% — below average capital efficiency
Weak financial health signals
Revenue declined 11.1%
Earnings declined 14.4%
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : PED
The strongest argument for PED centers on P/E Ratio, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 28.7% and operating margin at -12.0%.
Bull Case : WDS
The strongest argument for WDS centers on Price/Book, Profit Margin, P/E Ratio. Profitability is solid with margins at 20.9% and operating margin at 19.1%. PEG of 1.33 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bear Case : PED
The primary concerns for PED are Price/Book, Market Cap, Revenue Growth.
Bear Case : WDS
The primary concerns for WDS are Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score, Revenue Growth.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
PED carries more volatility with a beta of 0.30 — expect wider price swings.
WDS is growing revenue faster at -11.1% — sustainability is the question.
WDS generates stronger free cash flow (417M), providing more financial flexibility.
Monitor OIL & GAS E&P industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.
Bottom Line
WDS scores higher overall (53/100 vs 29/100), backed by strong 20.9% margins. PED offers better value entry with a 18.1% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Woodside Energy Group Ltd
ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA
Woodside Energy Group Ltd is engaged in the exploration, evaluation, development, production, marketing and sale of hydrocarbons in Oceania, Asia, Canada, Africa and internationally. The company is headquartered in Perth, Australia.
Compare with Other OIL & GAS E&P Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?