WallStSmart

Canadian Natural Resources Ltd (CNQ)vsPEDEVCO Corp (PED)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Canadian Natural Resources Ltd generates 38289% more annual revenue ($44.68B vs $116.38M). CNQ leads profitability with a 26.3% profit margin vs -14.6%. CNQ earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 79/100 (B+).

CNQ

Strong Buy

79

out of 100

Grade: B+

Growth: 7.3Profit: 9.0Value: 6.7Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 2.05

PED

Hold

48

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 6.7Profit: 5.0Value: 5.0Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 0.32
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CNQUndervalued (+46.2%)

Margin of Safety

+46.2%

Fair Value

$95.86

Current Price

$49.64

$46.22 discount

UndervaluedFair: $95.86Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for PED.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CNQ6 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
43.1%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 43.1%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
69.5%10/10

Revenue surging 69.5% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
83.8%10/10

Earnings expanding 83.8% YoY

Market CapQuality
$103.22B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
25.1%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 25 in profit

Profit MarginProfitability
26.3%9/10

Keeps 26 of every $100 in revenue as profit

PED3 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.9x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
33.2%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 33.2%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
561.0%10/10

Revenue surging 561.0% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

CNQ1 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
3.422/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

PED4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$193.13M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-23.8%2/10

ROE of -23.8% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-82.3%2/10

Earnings declined 82.3%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CNQ

The strongest argument for CNQ centers on Operating Margin, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 26.3% and operating margin at 43.1%. Revenue growth of 69.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : PED

The strongest argument for PED centers on Price/Book, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 561.0% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CNQ

The primary concerns for CNQ are PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : PED

The primary concerns for PED are Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CNQ profiles as a growth stock while PED is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

CNQ carries more volatility with a beta of 0.88 — expect wider price swings.

PED is growing revenue faster at 561.0% — sustainability is the question.

CNQ generates stronger free cash flow (4.4B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

CNQ scores higher overall (79/100 vs 48/100), backed by strong 26.3% margins and 69.5% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Canadian Natural Resources Ltd

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Canadian Natural Resources Limited acquires, explores, develops, produces, markets and sells crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids (NGL). The company is headquartered in Calgary, Canada.

PEDEVCO Corp

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

PEDEVCO Corp.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?