WallStSmart

Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG)vsPEDEVCO Corp (PED)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Diamondback Energy Inc generates 18620% more annual revenue ($14.46B vs $77.24M). FANG leads profitability with a 2.0% profit margin vs -46.8%. PED earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 44/100 (D).

FANG

Hold

41

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 4.7Profit: 4.0Value: 4.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.28

PED

Hold

44

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 6.7Profit: 4.0Value: 5.0Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 0.32
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FANGUndervalued (+41.1%)

Margin of Safety

+41.1%

Fair Value

$286.80

Current Price

$192.62

$94.18 discount

UndervaluedFair: $286.80Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for PED.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FANG2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Price/BookValuation
1.5x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Market CapQuality
$53.44B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

PED3 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.0x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
360.4%10/10

Revenue surging 360.4% year-over-year

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0010/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

FANG4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.2%4/10

4.2% revenue growth

Return on EquityProfitability
1.1%3/10

ROE of 1.1% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
2.0%3/10

2.0% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PED4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$175.58M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-23.8%2/10

ROE of -23.8% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-82.3%2/10

Earnings declined 82.3%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FANG

The strongest argument for FANG centers on Price/Book, Market Cap.

Bull Case : PED

The strongest argument for PED centers on Price/Book, Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 360.4% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : FANG

The primary concerns for FANG are Revenue Growth, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. A P/E of 191.9x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 2.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : PED

The primary concerns for PED are Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FANG profiles as a value stock while PED is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

FANG carries more volatility with a beta of 0.39 — expect wider price swings.

PED is growing revenue faster at 360.4% — sustainability is the question.

FANG generates stronger free cash flow (895M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

PED scores higher overall (44/100 vs 41/100) and 360.4% revenue growth. FANG offers better value entry with a 41.1% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Diamondback Energy Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.

PEDEVCO Corp

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

PEDEVCO Corp.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?