WallStSmart

PEDEVCO Corp (PED)vsExxon Mobil Corp (XOM)

VS
⚡

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Exxon Mobil Corp generates 333549% more annual revenue ($388.29B vs $116.38M). XOM leads profitability with a 10.5% profit margin vs -14.6%. XOM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 76/100 (B+).

PED

Buy

51

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 6.7Profit: 5.0Value: 5.0Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 0.32

XOM

Strong Buy

76

out of 100

Grade: B+

Growth: 7.3Profit: 6.5Value: 4.0Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 3.44
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for PED.

XOMSignificantly Overvalued (-83.6%)

Margin of Safety

-83.6%

Fair Value

$102.00

Current Price

$177.46

$75.46 premium

UndervaluedFair: $102.00Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

PED3 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.0x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
33.2%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 33.2%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
561.0%10/10

Revenue surging 561.0% year-over-year

XOM6 strengths · Avg: 9.8/10
Market CapQuality
$763.79B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Revenue GrowthGrowth
35.8%10/10

Revenue surging 35.8% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
111.4%10/10

Earnings expanding 111.4% YoY

Free Cash FlowQuality
$17.03B10/10

Generating 17.0B in free cash flow

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.4410/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Debt/EquityHealth
0.169/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

PED4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$198.45M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-23.8%2/10

ROE of -23.8% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-82.3%2/10

Earnings declined 82.3%

XOM2 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.524/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : PED

The strongest argument for PED centers on Price/Book, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 561.0% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : XOM

The strongest argument for XOM centers on Market Cap, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 35.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : PED

The primary concerns for PED are Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : XOM

The primary concerns for XOM are PEG Ratio, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

PED profiles as a hypergrowth stock while XOM is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

PED carries more volatility with a beta of 0.42 — expect wider price swings.

PED is growing revenue faster at 561.0% — sustainability is the question.

XOM generates stronger free cash flow (17.0B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

XOM scores higher overall (76/100 vs 51/100) and 35.8% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

PEDEVCO Corp

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

PEDEVCO Corp.

Visit Website →

Exxon Mobil Corp

ENERGY · OIL & GAS INTEGRATED · USA

Exxon Mobil Corporation, stylized as ExxonMobil, is an American multinational oil and gas corporation headquartered in Irving, Texas. It is the largest direct descendant of John D. Rockefeller's Standard Oil, and was formed on November 30, 1999 by the merger of Exxon (formerly the Standard Oil Company of New Jersey) and Mobil (formerly the Standard Oil Company of New York). ExxonMobil's primary brands are Exxon, Mobil, Esso, and ExxonMobil Chemical. ExxonMobil is incorporated in New Jersey.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?