WallStSmart

Procter & Gamble Company (PG)vsTantech Holdings Ltd (TANH)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Procter & Gamble Company generates 202980% more annual revenue ($85.26B vs $41.98M). PG leads profitability with a 19.3% profit margin vs 11.8%. PG earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 55/100 (C).

PG

Buy

55

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 3.3Profit: 9.0Value: 4.7Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 3.01

TANH

Hold

42

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 2.0Profit: 5.5Value: 5.0Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

PGSignificantly Overvalued (-211.9%)

Margin of Safety

-211.9%

Fair Value

$45.90

Current Price

$143.92

$98.02 premium

UndervaluedFair: $45.90Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for TANH.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

PG5 strengths · Avg: 9.2/10
Market CapQuality
$337.14B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Return on EquityProfitability
31.6%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 32 in profit

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.0110/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Operating MarginProfitability
26.3%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 26.3%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$3.81B8/10

Generating 3.8B in free cash flow

TANH1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.0x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

PG3 concerns · Avg: 2.7/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
1.5%4/10

1.5% revenue growth

PEG RatioValuation
3.932/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-5.4%2/10

Earnings declined 5.4%

TANH4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$4.17M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
3.8%3/10

ROE of 3.8% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-4.5%2/10

Revenue declined 4.5%

EPS GrowthGrowth
-11.5%2/10

Earnings declined 11.5%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : PG

The strongest argument for PG centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, Altman Z-Score. Profitability is solid with margins at 19.3% and operating margin at 26.3%.

Bull Case : TANH

The strongest argument for TANH centers on Price/Book.

Bear Case : PG

The primary concerns for PG are Revenue Growth, PEG Ratio, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : TANH

The primary concerns for TANH are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Revenue Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

PG profiles as a value stock while TANH is a declining play — different risk/reward profiles.

TANH carries more volatility with a beta of 0.68 — expect wider price swings.

PG is growing revenue faster at 1.5% — sustainability is the question.

PG generates stronger free cash flow (3.8B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

PG scores higher overall (55/100 vs 42/100), backed by strong 19.3% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Procter & Gamble Company

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS · USA

The Procter & Gamble Company (P&G) is an American multinational consumer goods corporation headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio, founded in 1837 by William Procter and James Gamble. It specializes in a wide range of personal health, consumer health, personal care, and hygiene products; these products are organized into several segments including Beauty; Grooming; Health Care; Fabric & Home Care; and Baby, Feminine, & Family Care. Before the sale of Pringles to Kellogg's, its product portfolio also included food, snacks, and beverages.

Visit Website →

Tantech Holdings Ltd

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · HOUSEHOLD & PERSONAL PRODUCTS · China

Tantech Holdings Ltd, develops and manufactures bamboo-based charcoal products for industrial energy, domestic cooking, heating, purification, agriculture and cleaning applications in the People's Republic of China and internationally. The company is headquartered in Lishui, the People's Republic of China.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?